Pair trading and multicurrency arbitrage. The showdown. - page 308

New comment
 
mvf358 #:
We need to put the even-numbered one back at the top. The even-numbered one can also be solved using the sine function, and in fact it’s not a bad solution at all.

What do you mean, sine? Are you out of your mind?

‘Even’ means a pair (TWO); anything else is rubbish.

It’s precisely the ‘paired’ one that should be discussed here.

 
Vitaly Muzichenko #:

What do you mean, ‘sine’? Are you out of your mind?

'Pair' means a pair (TWO); anything else is just porn.

It’s precisely ‘paired’ that needs to be discussed here.

But what I’m talking about is ‘Pair’, and the solution to it is also through equity. I’ll go further: through equity, you can even resolve trading in a SINGLE asset with a consistent profit.
 
mvf358 #:
What I’m on about is that, although it’s a pair trade, the decision is also based on equity. I’ll go further: using equity, you can even trade a single pair and achieve a consistent profit.

You could end up in a slippage situation and blow your account, or hit a stop-loss at half your deposit.

Go ahead and trade, but not in this thread.

 
Vitaly Muzichenko #:

End up in a no-retracement/sideways trade and blow your account, or hit a stop-loss at half your deposit.

Go ahead and trade, but not in this thread.

That’s exactly what I’m telling you: only open a position at maximum spread, after which a squeeze is inevitable.
 
mvf358 #:
after which a ‘shlop’ is mandatory
What exactly compels it to start converging rather than diverging further? What is your interpretation of this?
 
Aleksey Nikolayev #:
What exactly compels it to start converging rather than diverging further? What’s your take on this?
Good question. I don’t know what’s preventing it. But my ‘Sinus’ determines the deviation of the synthetic equity with relative accuracy. And it also determines the spread in the pair in one go. It’s all down to the algorithm that calculates all this. As I said, I have two stable values around which the whole forex market revolves.
 
mvf358 #:
I have two stable figures around which the whole of the forex market revolves

So, trade Forex based on your own figures. That’s right, that’s the way to do it.

There are also some practical traders in the thread on trends who trade Forex based on their own levels. Brilliant.

Only the trillionaires who trade Forex using their own formula are keeping quiet for now. But it’s not over yet.

 
Aleksey Nikolayev #:

So, trade Forex using your own figures. That’s right, that’s how it’s done.

There are also some practical tips in the thread about trends, where people trade Forex at their own levels. Brilliant.

Only the trillionaires who trade Forex using their own formula are keeping quiet for now. But it’s not over yet.

It’s actually simpler than that – if the dice shows 1 or 6, roll it again; otherwise, check if it’s an even number ;-)

It’s important to observe the phases of the moon, the hooting of owls, midnight… everything must be done at night, not every night, and it’s essential that the owls are actually there.

 
Maxim Kuznetsov #:

It’s actually simpler than that – if the dice shows 1 or 6, roll again; otherwise, check if it’s even ;-)

It’s important to observe the phases of the moon, the hooting of owls, the hour of the night… everything must take place at night, not just any night, and it’s essential that there really are owls

Who’s stopping you from ‘seeing through’ the levels? Go ahead and do so to your heart’s content. Who cares about the lack of statistical proof of their existence when becoming a trillionaire is at stake?
1...301302303304305306307308
New comment