Pair trading and multicurrency arbitrage. The showdown. - page 148
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
if you can tell me what it shows and what it's for, I won't throw it away:
for reference, iATR lags by 1/2 period, LWMA by 1/3, Tma redraws at a depth of 20 bars.
there is little left to do : at least "catch a falling knife": in all combinations ([+-]ABCD...) find the one that
1) exceeds the speed of light and
2) had a step dependence.
but now (1,2) has ceased to do so and walk towards it.
PS/ ideally, of course, to find the momentum and which knife will fly...but so far there are no good ideas about it :-(
Well written.
I'd have to know what language it's in.
There is no special formula there. If you want to get what he has on the screen "simply" build an indicator that superimposes the symbols he has on the screen with t.0 at 00:00. t.0 is reset daily. Only you need to "normalise" the values to the point value. I.e. if the chart symbol has a point value = 1, and the overlaying one has 1.25, then you need to multiply all movements of the overlaying one by 1.25. That's it. As soon as you normalise the charts, the volumes will be 1 to 1.
And the most important thing is that this Renat Akhtyamov was pestering a person in 2018 to find out the details of this TS, and now he can't even throw a link to others. Yuck to be like that....
you only read the topic very selectively ? :-)
1. courses always diverge. As soon as I opened a pair - so immediately and began to diverge.
2. Currency fluctuations are proportional to the logarithm of the nominal value. For simple traders - % of the price. The value is the same for all
2.1 as a consequence: in a logarithm chart - currencies move in the same scale
3. during a large period (a year or two or three) the divergence is only a few per cent.
3.1 during a long period of time the order of denominations A<B<C<D is likely to remain the same.
it is possible to count lots in inverse proportion to the log of the denomination, get weighted prices and project one graph on the other.
you only read the topic very selectively ? :-)
1. courses always diverge. As soon as I opened a pair - so immediately and began to diverge.
2. Currency fluctuations are proportional to the logarithm of the nominal value. For simple traders - % of the price. The value is the same for all
2.1 as a consequence: in a logarithm chart - currencies move in the same scale
3. during a large period (a year or two or three) the divergence is only a few per cent.
3.1 during a long period of time the order of denominations A<B<C<D is likely to remain the same.
it is possible to count lots in inverse proportion to the log of the denomination, get weighted prices and project one graph on the other.
if A B C exchange rates USDxxx (brought to a common base), then each of them fluctuates O(ln) .
when lots are taken in proportion to 1/ln(x):
+A/ln(A)+B/ln(B)+C/ln(C) ; you can use any +- signs, as well as the number of summands.
you get a synthetic "identical to natural", with minimal fluctuations (as in all)
and the general rules are also true for it: 1 point per minute is the speed of local light, and so on.
There is little left to do: at least "catch the falling knife": in all combinations ([+-]ABCD...) find the one which
1) exceeded the speed of light and
2) has a step dependence (accelerated).
but now (1,2) has stopped and is coming towards us.
PS/ ideally, of course, to find the moment and which knife will fly...but so far there are no good thoughts about it :-(
No. If the movement on the overlay was 400 and the point value was 1.25 (400*1.25). How much will this movement be if we move it to a chart where the point value is 1.00 (400*1.25/1.00)?
We need to move all the charts to the same coordinate system.
If we move the chart with the cost of point 1 to the chart with the cost of point 1.25, then 400*1/1.25.