That's not the way it works here. Bought something and the price went down. The TP was 30 pts. That's how we kept the TP. Up we crawl - do not change, sell when the TP is reached, down - pull the price. This is bullshit.
Alexey, probably by derogation Vladimir Karputov meant your post. The question was not about ideology of use, and I did not give recommendations on its use either. If you have no experience in TP trawling on currency pairs and therefore have nothing to report on the subject, then just refrain from spatial statements.
Serqey Nikitin #: Right... You can also trade according to lunar cycles...
I have successful (conditionally) counter-trend strategies. The moving SL is good enough there, but the TP, not even a fixed one, but a dynamic one, statistically leads to lower profits or losses.
The virtual Trailing Stop works in this pattern. TP and SL are also virtual. They are in the program and are not visible on the chart (they do not physically exist).
We allow the profit to grow, even if the price breaks the TP level, until we close it.
We close the order only when there are signs of return (on the chart it is 20-30%).
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
I agree about experience...
But if we think about it a bit: if there is an optimal closing algorithm for a position, why do we need SL and TP...?
That's not the way it works here. Bought something and the price went down. The TP was 30 pts. That's how we kept the TP. Up we crawl - do not change, sell when the TP is reached, down - pull the price. This is bullshit.
I agree about experience...
But if you think about it a bit: if there's an optimal closing algorithm for a position, why the SL and TP...?
This is only about trend trading.
This is only about trend trading.
I agree about experience...
But if you think about it a bit: if there is an optimal algorithm for closing a position, why the SL and TP...?
I agree about experience...
But if you think about it a bit: if there is an optimal algorithm for closing a position, why the SL and TP...?
Will there be an example? Or are you just for all the good
Yes there is EVERYTHING... But it would be considered an advertisement for yourself... and I don't need it...
Right... You can also trade according to lunar cycles...
I have successful (conditionally) counter-trend strategies. The moving SL is good enough there, but the TP, not even a fixed one, but a dynamic one, statistically leads to lower profits or losses.
Let me help you :)
The virtual Trailing Stop works in this pattern. TP and SL are also virtual. They are in the program and are not visible on the chart (they do not physically exist).
We allow the profit to grow, even if the price breaks the TP level, until we close it.
We close the order only when there are signs of return (on the chart it is 20-30%).
But of course this is not a 100% solution.