The future of the Forex industry - page 71
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
You're wrong, and you know I never cheat.
I don't care...
but it's pretty clear to me that you're bombarded by recognizing yourself as a penniless loser
otherwise you wouldn't be bombarded here
The main reason for the socialists' brouhaha is this:
They come to work by subway/train and enter the shop through the common entranceway,
whereas capitalists take a private car/taxi and go to their floor directly from the underground car park,
the socialists put on overalls and work at the machine all day long,
capitalists, on the other hand, wear expensive suits and other signs of exemption from hard degrading work,
and can even afford to go to yoga in the middle of the day,
yet socialists get paid less than capitalists and feel they're being robbed,
but in fact they're not - they just haven't learned how to be efficient.
The main reason for the socialists' brouhaha is this:
They come to work by subway/train and enter the shop through the common entranceway,
whereas capitalists take a private car/taxi and go to their floor directly from the underground car park,
the socialists put on overalls and work at the machine all day long,
capitalists, on the other hand, wear expensive suits and other signs of exemption from hard degrading work,
and can even afford to go to yoga in the middle of the day,
yet socialists get paid less than capitalists and feel they're being robbed,
but in fact they're not - they just haven't learned how to be efficient.
This is my impression of you. It seems to me that you are definitely not capable of self-sacrifice and would never have closed an embrasure of a bunker and would never have gone to work in the red zone as a volunteer when the coronovirus was killing even doctors. You have a certain sense of elitism and superiority and you view people below you on the social ladder as cattle. You feel a lack of humanism and the slogan: freedom, equality, fraternity - clearly not yours. Maybe you are not like that in real life, but your posts give that impression, so excuse me.
This is my impression of you. It seems to me that you are definitely not capable of self-sacrifice and would never have covered the gates of a bunker and would never have gone to work in the red zone as a volunteer when the coronovirus was killing even doctors. You have a certain sense of elitism and superiority and you view people below you on the social ladder as cattle. You feel a lack of humanism and the slogan: freedom, equality, fraternity - clearly not yours. Maybe you are not like that in real life, but your posts have created this impression, so excuse me.
Why should I kill myself if there are others who want to do so much more than me?
I won't deprive them of that opportunity.
Well it's just unreasonable, as I'm much more valuable in other ways.
Freedom and equality in basic rights I recognise, as do inalienable rights.
But at the same time it is quite obvious that the value of different people is different.
We've already talked about the cleaner and the lead developer / business solutions architect / lawyer / sales director.
Engineers are of course superior to cleaners but for the most part are interchangeable, you need to become as unique as possible.
There's no point in repeating that the principles of meritocracy and differential remuneration by value are universal.
Also a reminder that you should not try to look into other people's profits and demand that they be shared, even under the guise of a pay rise.
Note post #566 https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/368613/page57#comment_22328560
The only way to increase your welfare is to develop skills, become more and more unique and offer something very desirable to society.
No one is going to improve your wellbeing except yourself.
For some time now, I have started to realise the pointlessness of arguing about beliefs. I am always in a worse mood after an argument/discussion than before it started.
If my argument is stronger, I feel my interlocutor's mood worsen, if I "float" I feel hot and scarlet on my face. It all ends in nothing, literally. Everyone walks away misunderstood, frustrated and with their convictions.
Those who read these opuses do not have pleasant feelings either. In short, there is no point. Not at all. But constantly tempted to express their unique and undoubtedly correct opinion.
As a matter of fact:
In normal countries everything and everyone has been clear for a long time. We need capitalism (with restrictions on the ability of certain individuals on the Forbes list to spend excess money) + an equivalent of unconditional income for the poor and unpromising.
At the present stage of society's development, there is no other way. Otherwise there will be more crime and other cataclysms.
If hypothetically to fly to Alpha Centauri in the future due to "weariness" of the Earth, you can probably try to select 100k of the most intelligent and promising individuals.
However, the law of distribution (or Pareto 20%/80% if you like) and then everything will lead to "normality".
It should be understood that all 80% will never get to the 20% due to natural reasons, if only because of different IQs.
Apparently, a rhetorical Stalingrad and total defeat for the German rhetorical school is beginning to loom)
Hooray, comrades!
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/368613/page59#comment_22329823
After this post I would delete everything and ban the author of this quote.
Because ineffective, suffering is necessary ... - Who will determine who is ineffective and who has to suffer? There was one such person in history who built gas chambers and ovens. Ugh!
Suffering is about one's own suffering.
The full quote belongs to Eckhart Tolle - google it yourself.
What, is it a May Day escalation?
For some time now, I have started to realise the pointlessness of arguing about beliefs. I am always in a worse mood after an argument/discussion than before it started.
If my argument is stronger, I feel the mood of my interlocutor worsen, if I "float", I feel fever and scarlet in my face. It all ends in nothing, literally. Everyone walks away misunderstood, frustrated and with their convictions.
Those who read these opuses do not have pleasant feelings either. In short, there is no point. Not at all. But constantly tempted to express their unique and undoubtedly correct opinion.
But there are those who enjoy vampirism...
Not bad on page 71 about capitalism/socialism:)
As a matter of fact:
In normal countries everything and everyone has been clear for a long time. We need capitalism (with restrictions on the ability of certain individuals on the Forbes list to spend excess money) + an equivalent of unconditional income for the poor and unpromising.
At the present stage of society's development, there is no other way. Otherwise there will be more crime and other cataclysms.
If hypothetically to fly to Alpha Centauri in the future due to "weariness" of the Earth, you can probably try to select 100k of the most intelligent and promising individuals.
However, the law of distribution (or Pareto 20%/80% if you like) and then everything will lead to "normality".
It should be understood that all 80% will never get to the 20% due to natural reasons, if only because of different IQs.
These are dangerous trends,
first you level up the income of the poorest losers a little bit,
then they'll still complain that they're still poor because someone else is richer than them,
you even it up some more and they still don't have enough and they're ready to riot and smash shop windows...