The future of the Forex industry - page 77
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
That's an odd question. Maternity capital was created in order to increase the birth rate.
Why didn't they write that the poor should be chemically castrated, which is in line with your doctrine?
For simple reproduction an average family should have about 2.5 children. This is far from the case in Russia among the Slavs. If incentives are not created, the Slavic population will gradually die out. The country will gradually become Muslim.
You are arguing for birth control in poor families and aren't you afraid that the factories will be short of workers? Because the children of rich families will not go to work there.
This is quite a tricky question, I don't have a ready-made solution 😀
Also note that more population does not mean better.
With the same or slowly changing productive forces it will mean more hungry mouths per aggregate public product.
Whether population growth will be accompanied by outstripping growth in the public product is the question to ask.
Why else would there be a large population? - Except to politically squeeze out another population?
It should be obvious to people with progressive attitudes that it is more important to bet on growth through improved technology rather than the number of workers.
Right now biorobots are still cheaper than metal robots, but that will gradually change and the role of the workers themselves will diminish.
There will be more need for adjusters, tweakers and production supervisors.
As for chemical castration - this is of course a violation of human rights (as they are currently worded).
We must be more subtle, for example the right to live in cities and use the infrastructure should be given only if one has a licence to do so.
This would cause another problem - creating wastelands of wildernesses where outcasts would live - but perhaps this is better than living in cities.
I don't think equality between people will be achieved anyway, and the problem of how to deal with vagrants and the poor will have to be solved one way or another.
Right now, it's dealt with by zoning: there are richer-prestigious districts, there are middle-class districts, and there are disadvantaged poorer districts.
Historically, the financial filter always works itself automatically.
I myself was already uncomfortable with the neighbourhood of the less cultured and noisy contingent and was forced to relocate.
In the future, as human life expectancy increases, the issues will become even more acute.
It will become obvious that reproduction rates will become irrelevant.
All in all it is really a complicated issue, but it should be obvious that the birth of a new member of society cannot be trusted to those who have failed to provide for their own lives properly.
The chick of Soros' nest.
It's not a chick anymore, it's a big wolf.))
It's no longer a chick, but a mature wolf.)))
Or should I say, a vulture.
More accurately, a vulture.
I don't think that's quite right. A vulture isa bird that feeds on carrion. And the Drimmer is ready to drink live blood from poor workers, or maybe he already does.))
I don't think it quite fits. A vulture isa bird that feeds on carrion. And Drimmer is ready to drink live blood from poor workers, or maybe he already does.))
Drimmer's a vampire 😈
Great news!!! Russia is now thefairest country in the world! (according to transcendreamer)
This is not directly related to justice, but only reflects the characteristics of the national economy 😀
I would call fair the situation when there is no infringement on property, when laws are applied equally to all, when the product (and profit) from the use of property is guaranteed to belong to the owner, + when the inhabitants can choose how the collected funds of contributions to the state budgets will be used.
The latter is present in an embryonic form in the so-called people's budgets and initiative financing projects, but it is not enough and I would extend it to the entire tax and budget system.
There is no such state on Earth yet 😣 we should go to Mars 😕
Soros nest chick.
You're just jealous of me 😃
I don't think it quite fits. A vulture isa bird that feeds on carrion. And Drimmer is ready to drink live blood from poor workers, or maybe he already does.))
But you shouldn't insult wolves either.
More accurately, a vulture.
The less successful will always be jealous of the more successful, it's understandable...
The less successful will always envy the more successful, that's understandable...
And why should we be jealous? You have provided no proof of your success).