How to make giant profits on forex? - page 24
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
There are risks everywhere, you can walk out the driveway and get run over by a parking car, and it's all for free :)
If you are a forex broker, at least the risks are lower, you have no money but you are alive.
If you have a PAMM account, you will lose it and some gangster investor will cut you down).
Yes - on a 23% pullback - put a trade (relative to what was the general movement - if up - Selim to TP46% = if down - buy with the same target
Stoploss - this is 100% - it's the same rollover level with increasing lot (martini)
And once it was suggested exactly the opposite: not to open in the direction of the pullback, but in the direction of the main move.
Does this mean that it doesn't really matter where you open, as long as the MM is based on trade statistics?
We have dumb strategy 5 minutes TF - buy if Close[1] > Close[2], SL and TP are equal 200 points (5 digits), we have a smooth loss due to spread.
Transaction statistics for 20 years are as follows
11111111111110 - 1
What can be done with MM here?
1) If for example we wait virtually three times in a row for SL 000 and bet 4 times, we will have 1265 times TP against SL(608+309+142+69+40+18+5+3=1194). As a result 1265-1194=+71TP in the end this miserable profit will be eaten up by spread for 2459 trades
2) If you apply a regular SMP, the initial lot may increase by 8 times(000000000001 - 0001= 8 SL left in a row). If the deposit is not big, you can take the starting lot 0.01 then the maximum possible lot will be 2.56 and that is just to win back one initial bet of 200 pips. As a result, the profit is also around zero or less because of the spread.
I think there is no sense to use MM for such dull strategies, we should use more complicated strategies and use them for searching MM for huge profits.
And another question Aleksander:
We have dumb strategy 5 minute TF - buy if Close[1] > Close[2], SL and TP - the same 200 points (5 digits), we have a smooth loss due to spread.
Transaction statistics for 20 years are as follows
11111111111110 - 1
What can be done with MM here?
1) If for example we wait virtually three times in a row for SL 000 and bet 4 times, we will have 1265 times TP against SL(608+309+142+69+40+18+5+3=1194). As a result 1265-1194=+71TP in the end this miserable profit will be eaten up by spread for 2459 trades
2) If you apply a regular SMP, the initial lot may increase by 8 times(000000000001 - 0001= 8 SL left in a row). If the deposit is not big, you can take the starting lot 0.01 then the maximum possible lot will be 2.56 and that is just to win back one initial bet of 200 pips. As a result, the profit is also around zero or less because of the spread.
I think there is no sense to use MM for such stupid strategies, we should use more complicated strategies and use them for searching MM for huge profits.
You are right, you need better signals to enter. So most of deals are closed in profit without Martin, then there are less situations where Martin is used and therefore the probability of getting into huge drawdown is significantly reduced.
You're right, you need better signals to enter. So that most of the trades are closed in profit without martin, then there will be fewer situations when martin is connected and consequently the probability of getting into a large drawdown is significantly reduced.
Do you think this is even possible? Have you been able to do it?
Yes, this is from my practical experience. You can see the results of the test here .
You're right, you need better signals to enter. Then there will be fewer situations when a margin is connected and consequently the probability of getting into a large drawdown is significantly reduced.
In other words, may I add different filters - indicators, price action, TA, FA and reduce it to the following distribution?
1265-(150+80+20+3=253) = +1012TP of wins
Yes, this is from my practical experience. You can see the results of the test here .
It would be interesting to look at equity without reinvestment, on a constant deposit.
To begin with some characteristics of the strategy is necessary to approximate the conditions for participation in GOSLOTO.
Now we know how to achieve a big win, how to get intermediate prizes, we know the criteria to focus on when creating a lottery strategy. All that remains is to put it all together and finally formulate the first version of the rules:
That is, to add all sorts of filters - indicators, price action, TA, FA and reduce it to, say, this distribution?
1265-(150+80+20+3=253) = +1012TP of wins.
I didn't do distributions, I estimated results by test. I agree with what you have listed to improve the signal quality. I have not used FA in my EA. I have used only fractals from different TFs and scales. I have used mostly candlestick parameters of different TFs.