Undeserved negative comments and insults from a customer. What to do? - page 9
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
...and as always, all the forum members write their own comments without reading anything that has already been written in the thread.
That's because everyone is eager to insert their five cents, and not in an argument to give birth to the truth)
don't generalize "your" to "everyone".
The pronoun "all" has the meaning "encompassing all" -- i.e. your post falls under your own thesis that you came to the thread to "insert your five cents" -- which is true, since the number of your posts in the thread is exactly zero.
...and as always, all the forum members write their own comments without reading anything that has already been written in the thread.
Read, read, and the opponent probably also reads the TC, but can not write anything. Topik starter takes advantage of it, knowing full well that the other party to the dispute in the ban.
Shovel will come out of the bathhouse -- bury the TC -- and change his nickname from "shovel11" to "shovel111"
So because all are eager to insert their 5 cents, and not in an argument to give birth to the truth)
)) So far, only the, um... "Minaev precedent" has been born - the publication of the source code of a paid work.
So much for the Z-word.
#property matters
)) So far, only the, um... "Minaev precedent" has been born - the publication of the source code of a paid work.
So much for the Z-word.
#property matters
for violation of Freelance rule 1.12 (violation of customer's exclusive rights), like not yet, not banned from the resource and blocked access to Freelance -- so the "Minaev's precedent" is still "hanging" in readiness.
Here is rule 7.10 (in its part: work with decompilation in one form or another) - so it has killed more than a dozen Freelance users.
It seems that for the violation of Freelance rule 1.12 (violation of the customer's exclusive rights), no one has been banned from Freelance yet - so the "Minaev precedent" is still "hanging in the balance".
Here is rule 7.10 (as it relates to decompiling in one form or another) - so many Freelance users have died for it.
apparently they decided to say "stop" to violence
You guys are the very... like that.)) You don't want to say, "Dude, you're screwing up. You're drooling in anticipation of him getting banned and you'll be happy to have one less competitor in freelancing.
... one less competitor in freelancing.
one of the myths actively cultivated is that there are competitors and competition in Freelance.
... You can't just tell a guy, man, you're screwing up...
you told him that on page one -- but you didn't get a nickel until page six.
besides, it was your "good intention" that prompted Minaev to post the source code and break rule 1.12.
p.s. if Lopata got banned for swearing at Minaev -- just to be fair -- either 1) ban Minaev for breaking rule 1.12 -- or 2) unban Lopata.