Crowdsourced GUI. Open beta testing. - page 12
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
As Einstein said, it is not education that matters, but the depth of enthusiasm (something like that)
Any examples? I'm not talking about Mendeleev's time...
And are there any examples? I don't mean the time of Mendeleev...
Einstein himself, he was not educated)
I agree with his theory too
Doctors should of course be educated))
Einstein himself, he was not educated)
The answer is expected :) wait for more options ...
For those imbued with education, self-education becomes a life force, and Einstein included ...
Early. On the 3rd we can speak out on the specific outcome. Of course, some will probably be frightened by the "monster", but those who are braver will give an objective assessment. (As far as it stinks and "falls on the side"). Let's see.
The project itself doesn't stink at all - the bugs are elsewhere,
Types of implementations of your product:
Final version
Option 1: Simply generate code with buttons which we plug in to generate static menus
option 2: add support for dynamically writing code into the buttons, telling them what to send to what when and where.... so it should not be difficult to implement. You can get away from the terminal to create something in an external environment too.
variant 3: something which I obviously cannot imagine as I am not the author, as well as everyone who is not the author. But this something must be a couple of orders of magnitude more complicated than everything written above.
In all variations, the full functionality of creating the menus themselves is meant.
In any case, the experience is invaluable as practice.
Your project looks massive to you due to your not very good programming skills - so the code would be 10 times less ... really 10 times less. ... How many lines are there 20 000 - 40 000? It would be 2000-4000. And it wouldn't seem like a monster anymore. Just a program.
And creativity has nothing to do with it - it's just easier to read less code - and a programmer usually reads his code 20 times before writing something once.
SZS: Consider, for example, an article by one of the forum moderators (also not a professional programmer)... The layout of the articles is good even superfluous, as a result there are about 1000 lines of code where you should have written about 40 and it would have been much clearer.
However, you may envy the enthusiasm and purposefulness.
Mistakes: not wanting to study other people's approaches to similar issues, understanding how to implement them.
It should be understood that many participants of this forum disagree with MT libraries and rewrite them. i.e. they evaluate them, understand their code, see what they disagree with and rewrite them. But after fully understanding the workings)))) familiar phrases or something?))
sorry, deep in thought in my head)))
No, a familiar face (not a fact, I wouldn't have asked if I was completely sure). But judging by the fact that Peter steadily ignored that question of mine, it's very likely he did. And Peter?
The answer is expected :) wait for more options ...
For those imbued with education, self-education becomes a life force, and Einstein included ...
The project itself does not stink at all
Реter Konow:
Здесь никто не понимает одной штуки. ....
... You can invent here and you don't have to know everything.
Are these people uneducated? Right? ...
... So you can rub your "invention" in the uneducated?
Are we uneducated here? So...?
... So you can rub your "invention" in the uneducated?
So why manipulate...
Where's the manipulation?