I trade in triples. I exit when the swap and commission overlap + fixed (small profit). As a result DC gets 50% of the dirty profit. I don't feel sorry for it.
The base pair covers the drawdown. Commission kills all the joy, but the scheme seems to work from the 15th of January (construction #2 opens the other way) - has worked 18 times.
The question is, at what point in time and which of the structures is more effective? If it is applicable of course. Calculation as of 18:40 Moscow timeframe.
GBPUSD
0,38
EURGBP
0,51
EURUSD
0,64
EURUSD
0,62
GBPUSD
0,49
EURGBP
0,36
USD
GBP
EUR
EURGBP
0,4
EURUSD
0,76
GBPUSD
0,36
I trade in triples. I exit when the swap and commission overlap + fixed (small profit). As a result DC gets 50% of the dirty profit. I do not feel sorry.
The base pair overlaps the drawdown. Commission kills all the joy, but the scheme seems to work from the 15th of January (construction #2 opens the other way) - it has worked 18 times.
You need to look at the history. And what are your considerations and on what timeframe do you calculate lots in a triangle? Is it based on the condition of horizontality of the linear regression?
The question is, at what point and which design is more efficient? If it is applicable of course. Calculation at 18:40 Moscow time.
GBPUSD
0,38
EURGBP
0,51
EURUSD
0,64
EURUSD
0,62
GBPUSD
0,49
EURGBP
0,36
USD
GBP
EUR
EURGBP
0,4
EURUSD
0,76
GBPUSD
0,36
I trade in triples. I exit when the swap and commission overlap + fixed (small profit). As a result DC gets 50% of the dirty profit. I do not feel sorry for it.
The base pair covers the drawdown. Commission kills all the joy, but the scheme seems to work from the 15th of January (construction #2 opens the other way) - has worked 18 times.
Ooh, okay.
+
What's normal?
What's normal?
closed normally ;)
I just did.
closed normally ;)
And I just did.
You're answeringGrigori.S.B' s questionand hedidn't close anything.
You're answering Grigori.S.B' s question , and hedidn't close anything.
missed
You were.
;)
Have you found any particularities in the interpretation of the terms: stationarity, stability, robustness?
Stability is a specific property from matstatistics. Stability and resilience are very vague concepts with no strict evaluation criteria.
Stability is a specific property from matstatistics. Stability and robustness are very vague concepts with no strict evaluation criteria.
The relationship formula is simple: - stability of series characteristics = stationarity of the series.
The question is, at what point and which design is more efficient? If it is applicable of course. Calculation at 18:40 Moscow time.
I trade in triples. I exit when the swap and commission overlap + fixed (small profit). As a result DC gets 50% of the dirty profit. I don't feel sorry for it.
The base pair covers the drawdown. Commission kills all the joy, but the scheme seems to work from the 15th of January (construction #2 opens the other way) - has worked 18 times.
The question is, at what point in time and which of the structures is more effective? If it is applicable of course. Calculation as of 18:40 Moscow timeframe.
I trade in triples. I exit when the swap and commission overlap + fixed (small profit). As a result DC gets 50% of the dirty profit. I do not feel sorry.
The base pair overlaps the drawdown. Commission kills all the joy, but the scheme seems to work from the 15th of January (construction #2 opens the other way) - it has worked 18 times.
You need to look at the history. And what are your considerations and on what timeframe do you calculate lots in a triangle? Is it based on the condition of horizontality of the linear regression?
The question is, at what point and which design is more efficient? If it is applicable of course. Calculation at 18:40 Moscow time.
I trade in triples. I exit when the swap and commission overlap + fixed (small profit). As a result DC gets 50% of the dirty profit. I do not feel sorry for it.
The base pair covers the drawdown. Commission kills all the joy, but the scheme seems to work from the 15th of January (construction #2 opens the other way) - has worked 18 times.