Quantum analysis Duca - page 76

New comment
 
Nikolai Semko:

In fact, even a parabola of evolution rotated by 90 degrees becomes linearly uniform in such "quantum" coordinate system, because slowing down of evolution is compensated by decreasing of time density (subjective feeling of its speed of flow).

It is like in human life: When a child is 7 years old, it seems to him that to live one day is a great adventure, and a month is a very long time, so many events happened during a month, while in adult state a month flies by very quickly and a day is not an event at all.

To say nothing of a one-year-old child, when during one year he/she grows by 15%, when skills and abilities increase manifold, the density of his/her subjective perception of time is colossal.

We do not even remember our childhood up to 3-4 years of age, because the time was perceived very differently then and in a linear system of perception of time it was hundreds of years ago)).

In such linear system of perception of time our life equator is maybe somewhere at 3-4 years (it is possible that even in the womb, as there a person goes a much longer developmental path than in the whole life after birth). That is why it is so important what childhood was like, for a person's whole life...

These feelings are subjective (about childhood), related to the workings of the kocharyzka, but in no way to a universal pattern. The author still has some problems with the kocharyzka in this matter, i.e. it hasn't quite matured yet.

It is possible to differentiate the graph in different ways and get even channels. Anything at all is possible on the SB.

 

It's time for a poll on attitudes towards quantum analysis. In your opinion:

1) quantum analysis is dope

2) quantum analysis - dope

3) quantum analysis - dupa

4) quantum analysis - dukkha

5) your variant

 
I read 76 pages though. I thought it would be useful. There may be some useful info for some, but I've already gone through it all. The whole theory is underdeveloped which is why, after reading it a few years ago, I discarded it. There are some sensible points there that I used to even use, but as I developed it became clear that it wasn't enough, everything needs to be refined and reworked. It's a very superficial story.
The dukk space amused me the most) I use it and came to the need for "correct" price sampling myself, but how people like to call a primitive by its name. It never even occurred to me that it is possible to call such a primitive by its name, while others are still discussing it.
And most importantly written in a veiled all allegedly scientific, but in reality, there is a primitive and science to a minimum.
Oleg made a better theory in the section about the crisis with sinusoids. It is not perfect and requires serious modifications, but it is better.
 
quantum analysis - Dupa Lipa
 
Nikolai Semko:

is it? So I'm missing something...

Taking your picture from page 4 and observing parabolic channels.

I assume that if the quantum is gently increased they will gently transform to linear. I am not sure about this though. I need to experiment.


It is simply the intersection of two ordinary channels. And it is the development equation that gives them a parabolic appearance.
 
Maxim Romanov:
I did read 76 pages though. I thought it would be useful. There may be some useful information for some people, but I have already gone through it all. The whole theory is underdeveloped which is why, after reading it a few years ago, I discarded it. There are some sensible points there that I used to even use, but as I developed it became clear that it wasn't enough, everything needs to be refined and reworked. It's a very superficial story.
I use it and have come to the need for "correct" price sampling myself, but how people like to call a primitive by its name. It never even occurred to me that it is possible to call such a primitive by its name, while others are still discussing it.
And the main thing is written so veiled all and ostensibly scientifically, and actually, there a primitive and a science on a minimum.
Oleg made a better theory in the section about the crisis with sinusoids. It is not perfect and requires serious modifications, but it is better.

Maxim, with all due respect, but you simply haven't understood all the implications of quantization and the properties of Dukk space. But it doesn't matter, everyone has their own way.

 
Aleksey Nikolayev:

It's time for a poll on attitudes towards quantum analysis. In your opinion:

1) quantum analysis is dope

2) quantum analysis - dope

3) quantum analysis - dupa

4) quantum analysis - dukkha

5) your variant

- hole, black, in the budget for the naive.

And in time for the 'faithful'.
 
Maxim Dmitrievsky:

These feelings are subjective (about childhood), related to the workings of the kocharyzka, but in no way to a universal pattern. The author still has some problems with the kocharyzka in this matter, i.e. it has not quite matured yet.

It is possible to differentiate the graph in different ways and get even channels. Anything at all is possible on the SB.

Of course, the quantum chart has the property of fractality and you can draw many variations. The main criterion is the size of your deposit. On $100 you will draw one channel and on a million you will draw a completely different one.
 
QuantumBob:
Of course, a quant chart has the property of fractality, and you can draw many variations. The main criterion is the size of your deposit. On $100 you will draw one channel and on a million you will draw a completely different one.

stop fucking around...

 
Maxim Dmitrievsky:

stop fucking around.

Freedom of speech has not been abolished.) Down with the f...ing word!)

1...69707172737475767778798081
New comment