You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
In any case the MT5 terminal has nothing to do with it. There's something wrong with the computer.
More likely in the indicators/advisors used.
Yep. It's inconvenient without the results table displayed while you're working. But never mind.
Starting genetic optimisation.
First generation passes, second generation begins.
I stop, see the results.
Then I start it again.
Questions:
1. In the results XML file, the Pass column - now displays only one value, not the "generation, number" pairs as it was before. Is it supposed to be like this ?
2. When I start optimization continuation, pairs (0, xxx) appear in the log - i.e. generations seem to start again. Is it supposed to be like that ?
Yep. It's inconvenient without the results table displayed while you're working. But never mind.
Starting genetic optimization.
First generation passes, second generation begins.
I stop, see the results.
Then I start it again.
Questions:
1. In the results XML file, the Pass column - now displays only one value, not the "generation, number" pairs as it was before. Is it supposed to be like this ?
2. When I start optimization continuation, pairs (0, xxx) appear in log - i.e. it looks like generations start again. Is it supposed to be like this ?
The answer is.
Optimisation of a simple MA EA. I interrupted it 2 times and it always optimizes from the beginning.
Why didn't you say from the start that you were running genetics?
The principle of genetic search itself is based on randomness and so it has no point in "continuing what you started". Its job is to run randomly.
And even then the cache is used. It's just that your probability of hitting previously calculated results is very low (you have a search area of 50 million variants). So it looks like starting from the beginning, since the starting point is randomized.
Updated the terminal to version 1816.
Changed Sleep(60000) to Sleep(5000) in running EA. Compiled on new version of compiler.
I tried to open it on the chart and got EX5 loading failed.
Everything compiled on the old compiler seems to work.
What i have to do with it ? What do I do ?
I was told this
Why didn't you say from the start that you were running genetics?
The principle of genetic search itself is based on randomness and so it has no point in "continuing what you started". Its job is to run randomly.
And even then the cache is used. It's just that your probability of hitting previously calculated results is very low (you have a search area of 50 million variants). So it looks like a start from the beginning, as the starting point is randomised.
That's right.
I have a question about designations - generations should kinda stay ? И
In the latest versions - 1815 and 1816, during optimisation, a screen blink appeared when viewing the"optimisation graph" tab. Windows 7 operating system.
That's right.
I have a question about the designations - the generations are supposed to stay? И
The generations aren't going anywhere, but their work is a big mystery.
Updated the terminal to version 1816.
Changed Sleep(60000) to Sleep(5000) in running EA. Compiled on new version of compiler.
I tried to open it on the chart and got EX5 loading failed.
Everything compiled on the old compiler seems to work.
What i have to do with it ? What do I do ?
Generations are not going anywhere, the truth is their work is a big mystery.
Why "a big mystery"?
As for the work of the optimizer itself, I don't see any difference. All works well, and understandably, in case of process interruption a new process will be carried out with other data, which is given by randomizer.
I have a question about the designations. I just wanted to use the data of the generations in which this or that result appeared.