From theory to practice - page 629
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
And I'm waiting. While I shake the mice out of the bags. Cleaned out my purse already.
Did you find the lambda?
might be able to tell from the Weibull distribution, don't you think?
exceeds 1 and it's kinda time to jump out of the average incremental distribution rutDid you find the lambda?
Maybe you can tell from the Weibull distribution, don't you think?
exceeds 1 and it's kind of time to jump out of the average incremental distribution rut.What lambda, Rena? Holy shit... Don't distract me - patching holes in bags.
and here are Nova's ears:
of all the information the statistical software gives out, I like the median.
it's really there, I've seen it, I'll give you that.
;)
and here are Nova's ears:
Of all the information the statistical software gives out, I like the median.
It's really there, I saw it myself, I'll give you that.
;)
how is it better than the HLC/3 typical price method: (1.1676+1.1827+1.1782)/3=1.1761(6) <-> 1.1765.
At the 7th hundredth post came to the invention of the typical price, the members of this thread should believe in reincarnation, as in this millennium is unlikely to be consecrated.)))
how is this better than the HLC/3 typical price method: (1.1676+1.1827+1.1782)/3=1.1761(6) <-> 1.1765.
At the 7th hundredth post came to the invention of the typical price, the members of this thread must believe in reincarnation, as this millennium is unlikely to consecrate anything.)))
1,1761 != 1,1765.
sometimes for 1 point they requote, and here 4...No, the totals are different:
1,1761 != 1,1765.
sometimes 1 point causes a requote, but 4...Well not so much 4, for convenience 3.4 per 151 point HL, or two spreads per 100 point trend. Existing entries in this thread using X methodology have shown accuracy worse than two spreads, so there is no point in more accuracy.
Well not so much 4, for convenience 3.4 per 151 point HL, or two spreads per 100 point trend. Existing inputs in this thread using X methodology have shown accuracy worse than two spreads, so there is no point in more accuracy.
I don't know, statistical software gives a prediction:
The precursor equation for:Per2
Per2=1,17517436
let's see.
i didn't give it all the data on purpose...
PS
Here's what happened next.
that is, the forecast came true minus the spread, and then the price went down
however, if you look further back in history, alas, 1765 as well as the median has been missing for a very long time.
for now let's assume that the median is the resistance level...
I don't know, statistical software gives a prediction:
Preliminary equation for: Per2
Per2=1.17517436
Let's check it out.
I didn't give it all the data to analyze...
PS
Here's what happened.
So the prediction came true minus the spread.
However, if you look at the history, alas, 1765 was not there for a long time.
i.e. it turns out a variant:
At entry point put miniset at 10p and forecast next 40-50p has no sense. on eu 25th if to wait, error of entry 3,4p, if not to wait 9p.
Lord, help me to get rich on forex in the coming month!
Amen.
Lord, help me to get rich on forex in the coming month!
Amen.
Gold is forbidden to circulate, ask for another elder).