From theory to practice - page 1891
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Maybe you weren't paying attention. But it only thins ticks with the same price. This is useful in the sense of making the chart lighter.
But his strategy is hindered by the construction of the oscillator. Figuratively a 100hastic. With all its drawbacks.
He is not mature enough to look at the market.
One thing I can say, trading on the oscillator doesn't appeal to me.
It starts the same problems again:
- which TF to take.
- averaging
- parameters
These are all different kinds of filters.
There should be no filters, a blunt strategy and a throttle lever without brakes.
Well, until you dump the market, it will dump you ;))))Maybe you weren't paying attention. But it only thins ticks with the same price.
Where did you see that. No one knows what he is thinning or how he is thinning.
One thing I can tell you, trading on the turkey is not working for me.
It's the same problem all over again:
- which TF to take.
- averaging
- parameters
These are all filters of sorts.
There should be no filters, a blunt strategy and gas lever without brakes.
The strategy should be based on facts.
We have the facts: FA, rumours, fears andlastly price from history.
Renat Akhtyamov:
Well, until you lose the market, it will lose you ;))))
With a mere mortal's deposit it sounds like drinking the ocean.
With the deposit of a mere mortal, it sounds like - drink the ocean.
If you can't make it from $100, you can't make it from a million
Yes, I have everything.
I started it up before the New Year, you asked me to hold off....
stopped
so screwed up so far, one or the other
In simple terms. Trading comes down to two results, or a sensible strategy with stack analysis nudging moves and so on... and with stops of course. or to statistics without stops and without emotions.
i have a good view on the market... i prefer to use martin... it's out of the realm of sane...) ..........)
SZZ won't hide it, simple averaging is my current algorithm)
In simple terms. Trading comes down to two outcomes, either a sensible strategy with stack analysis nudging moves etc... and with stops of course. or statistics without stops and without emotion...
i have a good view on the market... i prefer to play with my martin... it's beyond the scope of sane discussion...) ..........)
SZZ won't hide it, simple averaging is my current algorithm) of course they are based on the stratum's parameters)))
What is the meaning invested in the word "strata"?
Losses?
What meaning is invested in the word "strata"?
Losses?
I understand a straightforward conversation about averaging... How do I know... Who has the losses... Yeah, imho, there's bound to be losses all the time. Or is there another opinion?) Although there are a lot of people here who say 100% of trades are closed in the +.
I understand a straightforward conversation about averaging... How do I know... Who has the losses... I don't know who has losses. If you have another opinion, it's true. Although there are a lot of people who claim 100% profitability.
Losses and drawdowns are different things.
If you have a 100% profitability you cannot make it without a drawdown.