From theory to practice - page 1386

New comment
 
Uladzimir Izerski:

For me it's useless rubbish, but for you it's trouble. To each his own.

You are better off trolling those who are weaker in character.))

I am a scorpio. It would be fatal for you.))) Think with your head sometimes!))

You write a lot of letters. Who's the troll?

 
Yuriy Asaulenko:

You write a lot of letters. Which one of us is the troll?

Of course, the one with few letters))

 
Uladzimir Izerski:

For me it's useless rubbish, but for you it's trouble. To each his own.

You are better off trolling those who are weaker in character.))

I am a scorpio. This will be fatal for you.))) Think with your head sometimes!))


Scorpio is the one who looks like Sabziro with some crap coming out of his hands?

 
Макс:


Scorpion, is that the one that looks like Sabziro with some shit coming out of his palms?

No.

Scorpion is not the childish mind you imagine.

It's terrible for trolls.

 
P = (n.positive events / N total events)*100

No one here is going to calculate anything using this school formula, is there?)

No one's interested?) Alrighty.)
 
Martin_Apis_Bot Cheguevara:
P = (N total events / n.positive events)*100

Nobody here is going to calculate anything using this school formula, are they?)

No one's interested?) All righty then.)

How about changing the numerator and the denominator?

 
Martin_Apis_Bot Cheguevara:
P = (N total events / n.positive events)*100

Nobody here is going to calculate anything using this school formula, are they?)

No one's interested?) All righty then.)

Nah. I am always interested in analysing the behaviour of certain interesting market participants.

It is not always possible to express emotions.

 
Алексей Тарабанов:

How about changing the numerator and the denominator?

+)
But all the same, can't we face the truth and start analyzing on the basis of the results.
That's much more efficient. Rather than creating sham theories.
 
Martin_Apis_Bot Cheguevara:
+)
But still, can't we face the truth and start analyzing based on the results.
That's much more effective. Rather than creating sham theories.

What and whose results? The question plagues me.

I've been waiting.

Gone to rest.

 
Martin_Apis_Bot Cheguevara:
+)
But all the same, can't we face the truth and start analyzing on the basis of the results.
That's much more effective. Rather than creating sham theories.

Well, not bogus theories. With all due respect to probability theory, it is, in fact, the last chance to find a solution when you no longer understand what is going on.

1...137913801381138213831384138513861387138813891390139113921393...1981
New comment