From theory to practice - page 938
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Implicit conversions then yes)))) I'm used to writing double n=0.0;
or
int p = 1;
double s=1000.0;
double s1 = s/(double)p;
well, this one does. Maybe they do it in a more elegant way ))))
double s1 = NormalizeDouble(s/NormalizeDouble((double)p,2),1); - I only do this) ahah))
Implicit conversions then yes)))) I'm used to writing double n=0.0;
or
int p = 1;
double s=1000.0;
double s1 = s/(double)p;
well, this one does. Maybe they can do it more elegantly, too.)
and for example division by 2 is better to replace *0.5 then you won't have to check for division by zero
With mql I'm never sure if I have it working correctly at all:DForum on trading, automated trading systems and testing trading strategies
From Theory to Practice
Martin Cheguevara, 2019.02.09 16:08
Here's a visual - the principle of a grid with mutual overlap of orders.
How do you think it will work? maybe have seen a thread somewhere with the implementation of this method. ?
I have no idea how to use it, but I have to look for bugs in my trading robot.
Implemented this method if anyone is interested,
As can be seen with the naked eye with the same testing parameters on the same tool, the risks have fallen by about half, the number of profitable trades has increased
from 80 to 90%, while the number of deals has approximately doubled.
Roughly speaking, the strategy described above has almost doubled the work of the entire system - it has become much safer.
Of course, the analysis of market movements plays a large role, but not the main one.
And the main thing this analysis should be performed on the TF below or equal to M5, because if anybody has read my posts about statistical analysis the real non-random movements are more pronounced on M5 or M1.
Above M30 there is no point in analysing anything at all, where the average movements almost completely cover and "hide" the non-random movements, because the fluctuations are much higher there.
Most traders hope that with the increase of TF the reliability itself will increase. As for currency pairs in practice - this is a completely wrong assumption.
PS: for the gifted people like #testnatsenyhopenneverquotes I have already explained that I programmatically take into account the peculiarities of testing conditions and make it so that the real trade was identical.
Implemented this method if anyone is interested,
It's a tester...
In practice, this way in simple terms sounds like this: increasing the margin into the counter-trend, accompanied by a decrease in equity.
//martini, with all its consequences on the realWhere has Sasha gone? Any thoughts?
So far I can say one thing - you cannot work with increments the way you are doing now, be it ticks, minutes or whatever.
Because this approach completely kills the process memory and no entropy formulas or any other bullshit will help.
But that's my opinion!
It's a tester...
Actually, if you take his word for it, he's been trading in the real world for a few years now.
It's a tester...
In practice, this path in simple terms sounds like this: increasing the margin into the counter-trend, accompanied by a decrease in equity.
//martini, with all the consequences exactly on the real.It's a tester...
In practice this way in simple terms sounds like this: increase in margin in counter-trends accompanied by a decrease in equity.
//In other words, I have not yet encountered a real account with all the consequences.The methods are simple (visually) and effective as an axe, that's why they work.
If there is at least one person who knows how to use one order with stop and profit to make a relatively consistent profit in the correct opening direction, please contact us and I will be very happy to learn from you.
If there is even one person who knows how to make a constant profit with one order with stop and profit in the right opening direction...
In futures, I mostly play with just one position, no fills or losses, and also no stops or TPs. I wonder how I know in advance where to close a position, at 10 points or 110.
The same goes for exiting a position. We do not need to wait for some SL when it is already clear that the price goes in the wrong direction and is not going to stop.
Imho, you can decide something in the market only by the current situation. When dealing with bees, you can't say anything in advance. (с)