[What do you mean by the word grail] Grail. - page 14

New comment
 
Mathemat:

Tried it. It didn't work, I didn't even finish the first one. Maybe the rest would have been more interesting, I don't know.

Try it again, you might enjoy it. In my experience, afterwards, "Anna Karenina" would be interesting...
 
Mathemat:

I'm talking about TA in the classic sense - wipers, RSI, Stoch, channels, CCI and other amateur "tools".

...

IMHO, too categorical...

When used in conjunction with FAs and seasonality, for example, it works.

 
Roman.: When used in conjunction with FA and seasonality, for example, it works.

If I understand the phrase correctly, it might work. But in this pile, it is likely that 1-2 components actually work, and all the others are already useless.

Roma, I only expressed my imho.

 
Mathemat:

If I understand the expression to the pile correctly - perhaps it does work. But in this heap, it is likely that 1-2 components actually work, and all the others are already useless.

Roma, I only expressed my imho.

It is understandable. It's just that to throw THAT kind of stuff around ( wizards, RSI, Stoch, channels, CCI and others...). :-)
 
Roman.: It's easy to throw THAT kind of stuff around ( wipers, RSI, Stoch, channels, CCI and others...). :-)
Roma, your ability to make a sweet out of any... uh... raw material I simply admire.
 
Mathemat:

You still need to learn from experience, and you can't do without your own perspective either.

Damn, can't get the link to Livermore in (probably due to portal updates):

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CB%E8%E2%E5%F0%EC%EE%F0,_%C4%E6%E5%F1%F1%E8_%CB%E0%F3%F0%E8%F1%F2%EE%ED

And he committed suicide.


You must have upgraded well! A week ago I was fine inserting HTML code and today there are empty posts!
 
Mathemat:

I'm talking about TA in the classic sense of the word - wipers, RSI, Stoch, channels, CCI and other amateur "tools".

TA in a more general sense is any mathematical analysis of prices/volumes. That's the one that can help. I will not enter into a discussion about TA.

It's not to the classical one. In the classical one, it is the second one.
 
paukas: This is not a classic one. It's the second one in a classic one.

Oh, boy. That's an interesting twist. What's the first one?

vladds: I see you have updated well! A week ago I inserted HTML code easily and today you have empty posts!

Developers are actively changing features, inserting new ones (css, say). New features - new glitches...

 
Mathemat:
Oh, boy. That's an interesting twist. What's the first one?

The first one was invented by self-taught amateurs who started "TA scamming suckers" threads.

You said it yourself.

Zy. The channels work. The horizontal ones work well.

 
Mathemat:

Oh, boy. That's an interesting twist. What's the first one?

Developers are now actively changing features, inserting new ones (css, say). New features - new glitches...


I see! Thank you.
1...789101112131415161718192021...26
New comment