[What do you mean by the word grail] Grail. - page 13
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Greatness comes from achievement, not from draining it :)
I agree. But .... I don't know anyone who has lost a fortune more than once ... and become famous.... although it's not all about the drain... yeah, it's about achievement.)
A few days ago I started reading memoirs of a stock speculator....
That's why I got in.)
I agree. but .... i don't know anyone else who's lost a fortune more than once ... and become famous.... although it's not all about the drain... yeah, it's about achievement.)
A few days ago I started reading memoirs of a stock speculator....
That's why I got in.)
I can recommend the Financier, Titanium, Stoic trilogy. Theodore Dreiser wrote it, I think you'll like it.
tara: Уточняю: применение им статистических методов.
I don't remember anything about that in the books about him. I doubt it, to be honest: he had no higher education. Read it here, very briefly. It's from another book, not Lefebvre's.
"Financier," "Titan," "Stoic."
I tried it. Didn't work, didn't even finish the first one. Maybe the rest would have been more interesting, I don't know.
I can recommend the Financier, Stoic, Titan trilogy.
Thank you) there's a lot of interesting things to read... would have time to spare.... I have MAGI MARKET MAGI by Schwager next in line.
I don't remember anything about it in the books. I doubt it, to be honest: he had no higher education. Read it here, very briefly.
Alexei, thank you, I will read it. My question is, why do you claim that TA is a dead end and that results are only achievable with [such and such methods]?
By the way, almost all people who achieved significant results in applied fields were exactly "dilettantes in mathematics". :)
Alexey, thank you, I will read it. My question is, why do you claim that TA is a dead end, and the result is only achievable with [such and such methods]?
I'm talking about TA in the classical sense - wipers, RSI, Stoch, channels, CCI and other "tools" of amateur amateurs.
TA in a more general sense is any mathematical analysis of prices/volumes. That's the one which can help. But I will not enter into a discussion about TA.