America's default, in Russian. - page 13
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
To the list of
I shake
Ten! Hold me eight!
===
Default is default, but there is a crisis of the spiritual genre. Grasping God by the beard (or by the balls - everyone has different fantasies))) - Neanderthal's dream, ochre painting the desirable.
To put it bluntly (I mean me) - not far off. "What is Froim Gracz thinking about? - About drinking a shot of vodka, about punching someone in the face..." // Babel
And do what? Eyeballing the monitor, profiting from bullshit that defies analysis. (Uh-huh! T-analysis!)) Experiencing a transient sense of satiety from various pursuits?
"There is no thing in the world worth mercy. Creation is worthless!" // Goethe
The RCC, the ROC or any other denomination is all in the past. What's left are the bureaucrats who "go everywhere" in our country.
No! For God's sake! I do not want to offend anyone. It's just that for me Faith and Religion are two big differences...
Anyway, it's time for the dump. Byblos is lucky in that not many people read it. Otherwise it would have been banned immediately. As an extremist literalist. Especially the Pentateuch. Hamas shoots a cigarette out of Dr Mengele, and everyone gets an infernal inferiority complex together.
It's fun here. :)
What's the point of being gloomy...
Volodya! Have you got anything to light?
I'm wondering which way to pitch the idea that defaulting on self-esteem is beneficial to the defaulting party.
Or rather, I'm wondering whether the idea will set the branch on fire, or whether it will ruin and bury it.
The idea seems to be leaking out, though. We'll see. I'm getting popcorn.
:)
I'm wondering which way to pitch the idea that defaulting on self-esteem is beneficial to the defaulting party.
Or rather, I'm wondering whether the idea will set the branch on fire, or whether it will ruin and bury it.
The idea seems to be leaking out, though. We'll see. I'm getting popcorn.
:)
I'm wondering which way to pitch the idea that defaulting on self-esteem is beneficial to the defaulting party.
Or rather, I'm wondering whether the idea will set the branch on fire, or whether it will ruin and bury it.
The idea seems to be leaking out, though. We'll see. I'm getting popcorn.
:)
I know what a default is, but what is a self-esteem default?
I know what a default is, but what is a self-esteem default?
There are chemicals that dilate blood vessels and consciousness, and there are lexemes that cause the same effect when repeatedly flashbacked.
Vladimir, as I understand it, is about overestimation. To look at it with an unkind squint. Taki, I don't mind.
One way or another, there are those who care about the default in America.
Some do not believe in it, some believe in it, like the end of the world, they keep predicting it, but can't wait )))
I know what a default is, but what is a self-default?
Shit. I'd hate to start with technical definitions... :) Although it's possible to get a kick out of that side of things as well. (Or bite?)
Probably best to start with an example.
Take me. I like to show off. I'm technically proficient at it. Showing off is not without an aesthetic component. I know my limits.
// However (as far as the measure is concerned) maybe I'm imagining it. :)
Ahem. Right. I guess I was wrong. Without a technical/terminological digression it won't work.
So if the definition of "default" is more or less the same, then with the definition of "self-esteem", dictionaries and encyclopedias make a lot of nonsense and they have little to do with it.
The point is that the term "self-esteem" - how shall I put it mildly... о! - self-living through and through. Because no one has ever had any self-esteem.
What is it, then? I mean, what's the traditional meaning behind the term?
And there is evaluation by the eyes of others, which all psychological literature triumphantly proclaims to be self-esteem, strictly referring to the social self-consciousness of the standard social being.
// Is it all right if I spill esoteric secrets on a trader's forum?
// ... Read the rules... there don't seem to be any physical prohibitions... I'll venture to continue.
So, I guess we can get back to my cheeky face. So... Yeah. I'm showing off, people are playing along... in the sense that some opinions are being formed about me.
A stack of opinions varied, but in principle observable, groupable and classifiable.
And this is the ONE thing (the one on the subject) - they add up with opinions of Expectations.
And what are expectations? Expectations are about the same as promissory notes. In order to keep my image (my face?) (exactly my face??), I have to act accordingly.
:))
Phew. I think I've set the context.
So, what is self-default, in this context? Well... apparently a refusal to pay one's debts... ? :) I mean, not caring about expectations.
And self-esteem... which I brazenly claim is not self-esteem at all. :)
It goes something like this.
Any more concrete recipes I can't write, for life is a creative business. Ritual reverences (and anti-reverences as well) will not help in any way, as well as mantras and shmantras with prayers.
I am not sure about hunger strikes because I am inexperienced, but exemplary ones will not help.......
;-)
One way or another, there are those who care about the default in America.
Some do not believe in it, some believe in it, like the end of the world, they keep predicting it, but can't wait )))