Is there a need for a lock in MT5? - page 36
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I know how payments are made, I was wondering
Do you know about the financial and settlement relationship between the brokerage house and its liquidity provider?
I see difficulty in understanding it, so I will give you a hint:
the DC in relation to its liquidity provider is...
what?
If you answer this auxiliary question, you will get an answer to the main one.
Good luck!
The rest of the quote is beside the point and out of place...
The DC is a client towards his provider, that's what I told you from the beginning when I mentioned the tiered system.
Good luck to you too.
The DC to his provider is a client, that's what I told you from the beginning when I mentioned the tiered system.
There!
So what connects them?
Is it a bank entry or is it the result of a trade that they settle?
Or maybe it's just the API of the two accounts, yours and the provider's?
Okay...
I see this topic is difficult for a meaningful conversation as well.
There!
And what connects them?
Is it a bank entry or is it the result of a trade that they settle on?
Or maybe it's just the API of the two accounts, yours and the provider's?
OK...
I see this topic is difficult for a meaningful conversation too.
I am telling you that the real supply of money is interrupted in the American bank and then only the information is chased.
I told you that the real supply of money is interrupted in the American bank and then only the information is chased.
I have explained to you that this is irrelevant to the question, especially to the overlap at the "interbank".
And I have explained to you that this is irrelevant to the question, much less the overlap on the "interbank".
It has nothing to do with the issue of locks, but it has everything to do with the system of the relationship between the DC and the ISP.
OK!
I'll try again...
This is purely about currencies and CFDs.
Let's leave the CFDs for now, let's take the currency market...
Starting from this post of mine with a quote:
ДЦ всё равно на межбанк выводит нетинговую позицию уже давно
(а кухни вообще никуда не выводят, и у кого остануться локи так это у кухонь).
Почему так происходит : при схождении форекса к народу(те чем мельче сделка) тем больше информации приходиться обрабатывать серверу МаркетМейкера. Чтоб его разгрузить ДЦ выводит на межбанк нетто-позу по ДЦ. Теперь настал черёд разгрузить сервер ДЦ,
и поэтому МТ-5 будет выводить нетто позу трейдера. Вот и вся арифментика. Комп каждого уровня занимается своим делом и работает спокойно без перегрузок, а не задёргивается от каждого центового запроса.
1. controversial statement, depending on the policy of DTs management
2. (these are not even up for discussion).
3. well, right, the brokerage firm withdraws not everything, of course, but only part of the needed
4. Ahem... that's not so much interesting as it is amusing.
And is the main question that asked!
How do you see this procedure of "outputting every trader" somewhere, if:
- everything the trader trades there is just his and the doc's business.
- the CD cannot physically withdraw anything from the trader
The brokerage house may only cover the trader's transaction at its own expense and in its own name.
And only if it sees the risk of loss. (read: pay out the profit to the trader).
It doesn't refer to the issue of locks, but to the DC ISP relationship system directly.
Well, what about the quote above.
а?
Well, what about the quote above.
а?
At the low, the DC closes your position and opens it when the low is unlocked.
The DC closes your position at the lock and opens it when the lock is released.
Let it continue to do so.
When you close the lot, the brokerage company closes your position and opens it when the lot is empty.
Well, almost right, because the server has an end-to-end netting system.
And almost, only because opening the door is an appearance/removal from the calculation of our tickers.
It's practically the same in 5.
On the 4 server, the only thing that was horrible was the reporting system.
This is when at the close of the day, the client with the lock, poza 0, and he (or she) owes money.
The accountants would shoot themselves... >> or fell into a slight degree of confusion...
)))