Market theory - page 59
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Yousufkhodja Sultonov:
In the meantime, the clouds are gathering in the market,
it is true that the clouds are gathering.
change the form of the signals.
it is true that they are thickening.
change the form of the signals.
Commissions, if any, are ironcladly affected. Swap does not affect intraday trading, but if positions are rolled over to the next day, it does too. Moreover, swap is positive and negative, i.e. it can affect both positively and negatively. The commission always affects only negatively.
As of 2200 MSK, the market remains bullish:
Trading is around the second, bullish break-even level. Market type is competitive, possible market boundaries (price area between the two breakeven levels) have been extended by a strong Bear retreat, apparently to strike a blow to the Bulls. Why did the market masters (market and optimum) need to lower the level 2, the bearish breakeven, so much down into the virtual price area (hardly anyone is willing to sell Euro at such a low price) is for us to figure out when we investigate the consequences of such a scenario:
Gentlemen, introduced just 1.9 points of spread as a fixed cost to the trader. This results in a complete breakdown of the structure, functioning and management of the market. The Forex market is alien to the concept of spread, this is an unacceptable fixed cost! At 2 pips the profit is negative at all, all levels, having thrown the price, gather in one general break-even line, called, within the framework of this theory, a zugzwang condition. which I will tell you about when I have time:
Gentlemen, introduced only 1.9 points of spread as a trader's fixed cost. This results in a complete breakdown of the structure, functioning and management of the market. The Forex market is alien to the concept of spread, this is an unacceptable fixed cost! At 2 pips profit goes into minus at all, all levels, by throwing the price, gather into one general breakeven line, called, within this theory, a zugzwang condition. which I will tell you about when I have time:
You wrote that your theory is suitable not only for forex, but also for usual food, goods and services market. Well, when you trade food you do have overheads, don't you? And why can't there be in Forex? Maybe in your formulas you are not taking something into account or there is a mistake somewhere? At a currency exchange office, would someone sell and buy you dollars at the same price? There is always a difference, which allows the exchange offices to make a profit and pays for the maintenance of that exchange office.
But in principle, if your charts allow you to trade without taking into account the spread, you can do without it. Except that your theory will not be complete without taking into account the spread. The main thing now is to give practical results and start trading as soon as possible. And you can think about the spread at your leisure.
You wrote that your theory is not only suitable for forex, but also for the normal food, goods and services market. Now, when you trade in food you do have overheads, don't you? And why can't there be in Forex? Maybe in your formulas you are not taking something into account or there is a mistake somewhere? At a currency exchange office, would someone sell and buy you dollars at the same price? There is always a difference that allows the exchange offices to make a profit and pays for the maintenance of that exchange office.
You wrote that your theory is not only suitable for forex, but also for the normal food, goods and services market. Now, when you trade in food you do have overheads, don't you? And why can't there be in Forex? Maybe in your formulas you are not taking something into account or there is a mistake somewhere? At a currency exchange office, would someone sell and buy you dollars at the same price? There is always a difference, which allows the exchange offices to make a profit and pays for the maintenance of that exchange office.
But in principle, if your charts allow you to trade without taking into account the spread, you can do without it. Except that your theory will not be complete without taking into account the spread. The main thing now is to give practical results and start trading as soon as possible. And you can think about the spread at your leisure.
As for the spread, I've already answered it and when we learn to correctly estimate it, then we will do it. In the meantime, right, there's no point in dwelling on it, but to identify opportunities in forecasting the situation. For now, we state that there is the toughest clarification of the relationship, since mid March, and the price itself does not give to know about it, and we see the approach of some fateful, for the euro, decisions.
I would like to ask participants, is the chart format and movement of virtual levels clear? Can you judge if there is an entry or exit moment, by looking at it? Please answer, it is very important.
Gentlemen, introduced just 1.9 points of spread as a fixed cost to the trader. This results in a complete breakdown of the structure, functioning and management of the market. The Forex market is alien to the concept of spread, this is an unacceptable fixed cost! At 2 pips the profit is negative at all, all levels, having thrown the price, gather in one general break-even line, called, within the framework of this theory, a zugzwang condition. which I will tell you about when I have time:
And then the TRUTH was revealed to Yusuf.