Spammers, private message spam, discussion spam, feedback spam - page 2
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
all publicity posts across the whole forum -- will they now be concentrated in this one thread?
It's always a user's choice whether to post complaints in the complaints thread or in this thread.
that's true, but -- advertising on the forum is banned -- if so -- is moving banned advertising to this thread eligible?
Doesn't this thread -- instead of anti-spam -- become a spam repository?
that's true, but -- advertising on the forum is banned -- if so -- is moving banned advertising to this thread eligible?
doesn't this thread -- instead of an anti-spam thread -- become a spam accumulator?
Maybe it will be like this - on resolved issues, delete posts from this thread.
All this could be automated based on a reputation system. If, for example, user X starts getting complaints (a lot of different people hit the "Spam" button), his rating goes all the way down to negative, when the ability to post anything is blocked by the site.
So some group cooperates and starts fighting not the spammer, but the undesirable person, bringing his rating down to the basement, and? How does one then fight this?
Well, it's not my personal concoction regarding reputation and consideration of community opinion in relation to individual individuals. This is a technical problem, which the developer of each site is free to solve in his own way (e.g. by developing algorithms for identifying fraud) or not to solve.
By the time they do, the poor guy's rating will have collapsed. And then it's a matter of time before he's reinstated... If at all.
I have a precedent on one site where bonus funds can be transferred to one's trading account.
So there's such a system there. I'm there recently and put in place one of the local residents - it's too pathos and imposing himself in conversations. Everything about him is right and correct, and everything that's not according to him is wrong... He's a sucker all around. So I ducked him by letting him know I wasn't going to grovel before his majesty. My bonuses started to melt away. I looked it up and there was a complaint about every post I made. I'm not going to look into it - I didn't come there for the bonuses, I came there for something else. At the same time I give tips on programming to those who ask. So - even one offended czar can make a mess, let alone a bunch of them.
By the time it's revealed, the poor guy's rating will have collapsed. And then it's a matter of time before he's reinstated... If at all.
I have a precedent on one site where bonus funds can be transferred to one's trading account.
So there is such a system there. I just recently there and put in place one of the local residents - it's too pompous and flamboyant he behaved in a conversation. Everything about him is right and proper, and everything that's not according to him is wrong... He's a sucker all around. So I ducked him by letting him know I wasn't gonna grovel before his majesty. My bonuses started to melt away. I looked it up and there was a complaint about every post I made. I'm not going to look into it - I didn't come there for the bonuses, I came there for something else. At the same time I give tips on programming to those who ask. So - even one offended czar can make poop, not to mention a bunch of them.
Is not on the "I" begins, also ran into a gang of bonus-hunters there, well at least in the specialized branches do not interfere.
But the very idea of introducing a "like/dislike" button in posts, comments, and taking it into account in the rating is not bad, makes you think before you write. Following the example of another resource, spammers, grail sellers, and just arrogant cheeky quickly get thrown "red bricks". That's self-organisation. The moderators keep an eye on it all.
Doesn't the "E" start, also ran into a gang of bonus-hunters there, good thing they don't get into specialised threads.
But the very idea of introducing a button "like - do not like" in the post, comments, and taking it into account in the rating is not bad, makes you think before you write. Following the example of another resource, spammers, grail sellers, and just arrogant cheeky quickly get thrown "red bricks". That's self-organisation. And the moderators keep an eye on things.