Suggestions, comments, errors on the Signals service - page 18
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
As a suggestion - you could create in the Demo section of the signals Adrenaline group - and place there everything with a leverage of 1:500 and yield higher than XXXX%.
There is a form "Offers" in Service Desk - don't worry, you may even raise your rating...
But otherwise, the idea will sink into the depths of the forum....
As a suggestion - you could create a group Adrenaline in the Demo section of the signals - and put there everything with a leverage of 1:500 and a yield higher than XXXX%.
In general, the demo should be removed.
500 is enough.
I amsuspicious of all the cent accounts, real accounts with small depots and demos, which are registered in the signals with trading history.
I hope the MCs will take into account the wishes of the employees.
I hope the MCs will take into account the wishes of the workers.
Suspicion, a trait - not compatible with investor thinking, you need facts!
The rest is water.... sorry to be blunt!
Suspicion, a trait - not compatible with investor thinking, you need facts!
I mean, the phenomenon has long been known on many PAMM sites, where accounts with any trading history are registered.
I don't know how accounts with a false return curve are calculated, for the history is nothing to crow about, even drawdowns are present.
I mean that the phenomenon has long been known on many PAMM sites where accounts with any trading history are registered.
I don't know how accounts with a false return curve are calculated, for the history is nothing to crow about, even drawdowns are present.
Have you yourself ever been in a situation where you lost your money on the basis of the falsity of the manager's report on history?
Or have you read about it somewhere ....
To be honest - this is the first time I've encountered such term in my practice - "false profitability report".
If I wanted to trade on a demo, I could draw many interesting things on the tester, while on the real account, even on a cent one, I would have only one option - 8 accounts going in different directions, then 4 going in different directions, then 2 going in different directions, leaving only one account with awesome equity... I don't think it has any prospects, at least in the long term unless the managers take care of that ...
Have you yourself ever been in a situation where you lost your money on the basis of the falsity of the manager's report on history?
Or have you read about it somewhere....
Ivan, I, unlike you, am not in the mood to hit the keys.)
My answer is this. At one PAAM platform there are almost no accounts with more than 100% profitability with acceptable landings on the condition that they have registered on the platform at the opening of the account, ie from scratch. But there are enough accounts with the given profitability at minimal risks which were registered in PAMM after achievement of the mentioned results. Think about the "phenomenon".
P.S. the experience is) and so I say. come up with any euphonious term, the essence does not change.
Good luck.
Ivan, I'm not in the habit of hitting the keys like you are.)
My answer is this. At one PAMM area almost none accounts with a yield over 100% with acceptable landing on the condition that they are registered on the site when opening an account, ie from scratch. But there are enough accounts with the given profitability at minimal risks which were registered in PAMM after achievement of the mentioned results. Think about the "phenomenon".
We will continue to work on the accounts of all the PAMM accounts.
Strange service. well, you know what's what.... again, the question hinges on the criteria.... how long has it existed, reputation, massiveness, reviews....
Good luck to you too!
Strange service. you get the point.... again the question is about criteria.... how long has it existed, reputation, massiveness, reviews....
Good luck to you too!
I don't know how accounts with a false return curve are calculated, for there is nothing to crow about on history, even drawdowns are present.
I wonder if you have ever tried trading on the demo for more than 6 months to talk about the false profitability curve, I'm not even asking about the real one.
I haven't, I'm just learning.