Your opinion... - page 8

New comment
 
Swetten:
In eliminating non-trading risks.
With your brains, you just don't get trading tanks... Got any officers?
 
OnGoing:
That's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about profitability, stability, etc. Where is the guarantee?
You have been trading in a PAMM account for a year and it is profitable, so where is the guarantee that it will fail tomorrow? (Profitability and profitability are known and are discussed with the trader)
 
Ubajal:
With your brains, you can't get trading tanks... Got any officers?
A real colonel.
 
Swetten:
In eliminating non-trading risks.
Yes, to get your 100 quid back at the end of a trading period is certainly the best reward ))
 
Swetten:
A real colonel.
I'm a real captain.
 
Ubajal:
... Any officers?
You fallen behind from the regiment?
 
Tantrik:
The PAMM account has been trading for a year and is profitable, so where is the guarantee that it will be drained tomorrow?(Profitability and profitability are known and are discussed with the trader)
Is there more profit from their discussion? Or the risk of loss decreases?
 
Tantrik:
Is the regiment behind?
Yeah, I'm lagging behind, will you pay me cattle for my concussion?
 
OnGoing:
Is there more gain from discussing them? Or does it reduce the risk of being drained?
First of all, you can see the adequacy of the person you are talking to and the finer details - his explanations of the drawdowns. No risk - a term deposit in a comp. bank.
 
Ubajal:
Yeah, Backlash, will you pay me cattle for my concussion?
Unfortunately not the farmer. The motherland pays for the concussion!
123456789101112
New comment
Reason: