Interesting and Humour - page 3746

 
Gorg1983:


What if you want to do your best in your own country but you do not succeed in it to the fullest? Is it worth it to move to a place where you can fulfill yourself more fully, or do you immediately become a traitor to your country? If the government does not have a task in a certain vector, you will exist in this vector only up to a certain point. For all that, only a critical mass of people with the same vector can make this government move in a certain vector. The only thing is that it may accumulate when.

What is more important, to realise your potential and reveal to the world a possible new discovery, or to be engaged in the remaking of society and government in the hope that it will succeed, thus depriving the whole world of a possible new discovery. What is more important self-realization and inner harmony or desire to be remembered for centuries, can be harmonious without desire to be immortalized.

Why is your theory about meanings correct?


It is very simple - raise your children, raise them to be human beings, not boorish cattle, these children will form the government in the future. What you can change is close at hand, closer than many people may think.
It's very simple. That your son can dream of morning fishes on a quiet lake, when the water is covered with mist and the rubber boat is all wet with dew, when you can see crayfish crawling on the bottom through clear water and when not far away the oil mill in the neighbour's village is humming monotonously in total silence. So that when you will be gone your children will have sweet dreams about the analog clock with a cuckoo. It means that your life was not lived in vain, the children sleep well at night, the waters are clean, the cows give milk and there is something to churn butter from in the village...
It's all very simple.
 
Andrey Dik:

It's very simple - bring up your children, raise them to be human beings, not boorish cattle, these children will form the government of the future. What you can change is close by, closer than many may think.
It's very simple. That your son can dream of morning fishes on a quiet lake, when the water is covered with mist and the rubber boat is all wet with dew, when you can see crayfish crawling on the bottom through clear water and when not far away the oil mill in the neighbour's village is humming monotonously in total silence. So that when you will be gone your children will have sweet dreams about the analog clock with a cuckoo. It means that your life was not lived in vain, the children sleep well at night, the waters are clean, the cows give milk and there is something to make butter from in the village...
It's all very simple.

Yes, a beautiful dream, and there's a thunderous "company up". Wouldn't it be better not to dream, but to really have these fishing trips on a quiet lake? Or do you think it's enough just to dream?
 
Andrey Dik:

It is very simple, bring up your children, raise them to be human beings and not boorish bums, these children will form the government in the future. What you can change is close at hand, closer than many people may think.
It's very simple. That your son can dream of morning fishes on a quiet lake, when the water is covered with mist and the rubber boat is all wet with dew, when you can see crayfish crawling on the bottom through clear water and when not far away the oil mill in the neighbour's village is humming monotonously in total silence. So that when you will be gone your children will have sweet dreams about the analog clock with a cuckoo. It means that your life was not lived in vain, the children sleep well at night, the waters are clean, the cows give milk and there is something to churn oil from in the village...
It's all very simple.


What about me? With children it is clear, it may even be possible through a generation, because the critical mass is not easily accumulated, especially if it is strongly hindered. No matter how you look at it, children grow up in society, and what they will be sometimes does not depend on us. So if I fail to fulfil myself in my home country for the reasons described above, then put it on me and take care of my children, maybe they will succeed, right?

So far, in order for children to enjoy a quality of life in normal prosperity, with lakes and other things, they often have to become a boorish cattle, and nowadays they can mostly go to lakes, with few exceptions. And how does a boorish boor raise a highly spiritual one? It is a vicious circle. And the question is why the boorish can mostly afford "lakes".

 
Gorg1983:


What if you want to do your best in your homeland, but you cannot do it to the full est? Is it worth moving to a place where you can do your best, or are you a traitor?

If you are not successful in your homeland, do not think that it will be easier in a foreign land, that paradise awaits you there. It is good where we are not. We are a country with a developing economy and we have more opportunities than countries with a developed economy, where the competition is much higher. I have already told you here about my nephew who went to New York. He did not do well there and dreams of returning.
 
There are plenty of ticks in the woods now, so fishing on a quiet woodland lake will be a bust, not even a dream.
 
Dmitry Fedoseev:
There are a lot of ticks in the woods now, so fishing on a quiet forest lake is out of the question, not even a dream.
I picked up a tick once, just by the Ilmen forest lake (near Miass). A song festival is held near that lake, Mityaev organizes it there.
 
khorosh:
If you don't succeed in your homeland, don't think that it will be easier in a foreign land, that paradise awaits you there. It is good where we are not. We are a country with a developing economy and we have more opportunities than countries with a developed economy, where the competition is much higher. I have already told you here about my nephew who went to New York. He did not do well there and dreams of going back.
That's right: here he is the first guy in the village and there he is second-rate from a third-world country :)
 
khorosh:
If you can not do it in your homeland, do not think that it would be easier in a foreign land, that paradise awaits you there. It is good where we are not. We are a country with a developing economy and we have more opportunities than countries with a developed economy, where the competition is much higher. I have already told you here about my nephew who went to New York. He did not get anything good out of it.


Is it your habit to judge prospects by a single case or a small number of them? What bright future are you talking about? You said yourself in the thread that you hate it and you are doing the same. That is why there is a thief upon a thief around, put a righteous person who shouts the most, and look, and the house is already worse than before.

I have seen how the economy is developing, there is no machinery in production, except for the old ones that have been dying since the Soviet times, the farmers of the most fertile areas are being stifled by monopolists (and monopolists, you know, are all in law). Going to the countryside is a nightmare. For many people from megalopolises it would never occur to them how one can live like this.

I'm not complaining, you'll think about it now, but I'm not trying to promote that everything is good here or so. And God forbid you to think that I am from the opposition, there are more crooks in their ranks than the existing ones.

And statistics can be called anything, that is what statistics is all about, you put it next to some data, you look compared to others, you are screwed.

 
khorosh:
I picked up a tick once, just by the Ilmen forest lake (near Miass). A song festival is held near that lake, Mityaev organizes it there.

Chelyabinsk ticks are strict. They can appear even when you don't expect them in the cold, in autumn.
 
Aleksey Levashov:
That's right: first guy in the village here and second-rate third-worlder there :)
It's not always like that, of course. If you are a well-known big specialist with knowledge of English, you can get a good job there. But this is a person who has had an established career, not someone who did not succeed in his or her home country.
Reason: