Errors, bugs, questions - page 2750

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I'm sorry, I don't formulate it well.
I was most confused by your initial emphasis on strings, even though it's about the function.
If the test had been done with the function cache, it would have been much clearer
As a possible solution to the problem, the developers suggest introducing a predefined variable:
And why should two consecutive calls at an interval give the same result?
And why should two consecutive calls at an interval give the same result?
And why should two consecutive calls at an interval give the same result?
Because we are only talking about Tester without using Sleep- 99% of EAs.
I can't say anything about arbitrary Tester delays, as I've never seen this mode to be useful.
I can't say anything about the tester's arbitrary delays, as I've never seen this mode to be useful.
I only used it to debug the functions of working with orders
It is quite handy to see how much the tester's chart will change its slope, i.e. how much the trading logic of working with market orders "lags"
A defect in ME debugger(build 2370) - after abreakpointis triggered, instead of continuing code execution by pressing (F5), the samebreakpointis actually triggered againwithout executing any code.
Replay steps:
1) Manually setthe breakpoint for both lines " arr.Add()";
2) Start debugging (F5);
3) Use PCM to open the <Generic\ArrayList.mqh> nested file in a new tab.
4) Find the line "if(m_size==ArraySize(m_items))" in the function "bool CArrayList::Add(T item)" and setthe breakpoint manually.
5) While in the "ArrayList.mqh"tab, continue executing the code (F5).
This willtrigger the samebreakpoint as before without any actual code execution.
Thanks for the message.
Corrected by
Because we are only talking about the Tester without using Sleep- 99% of EAs.
I can't say anything about arbitrary Tester delays, as I've never seen this mode to be useful.
Without fundamentally changing anything, it's easier to make (which in fact is the case) that recording:
would mean
at least there is no question about copying strings
Without fundamentally changing anything, it is easier to make (which in fact it is) that the entry
would mean
at least the question of copying lines disappearsit's not what he's asking for. He needs the fastest access to MqlTick structure on every tick.
it's kind of a paradox that there is access to _Symbol .... but you don't have access to
although the MQL language is positioned as the language for development of trading strategies.... I don't know what kind of TS there is if you don't know the current prices on the current tick
it asks for something else in the end, it needs the fastest possible access to the MqlTick structure on every tick
And what's wrong with
is not good enough? Show me where the bottleneck is? If it's slow too, then the Developers have a way to inline/optimize such a call - without any fundamental changes
What's not to like
is not good enough? If it's slow too, then the Developers have a way to inline/optimize such a call
yes it is slow, at least in the tester, I write so in the testerhttps://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/1111/page2749#comment_16487642
with a large number of optimizer passes there is a gain
I don't know how to explain, I don't know how to explain elementary things...
how do you write EAs? - You compile a library in procedural or OOP style, each function is fully transferable to another project, and to ensure this you write Bid, Ask everywhere - my example. Then you assemble a trading strategy out of the blanks. What developers offer now - write SymbolInfoDouble() everywhere