Errors, bugs, questions - page 2664

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Does anyone have this compiled?
What's wrong with it?
It's OK, come back for more:
definition for static array has been moved above the creation of class Y.Is it now possibleto run optimization+teston all symbols in the market review? Or only without optimization just run with the same parameters is done on the whole review?
That is, you can run a test not only with the same parameters for the symbols in the Market Watch, but optimize them at the same time? Otherwise, the selection of optimization parameters is blocked when all symbols are selected.
Is it now possibleto run an optimisation+teston all the symbols in the market review?
https://www.mql5.com/ru/code/26132
https://www.mql5.com/ru/code/26132
Yes.
Unable to commit to storage...
Same problem again! Developers, please fix the storage! It's impossible to work with it. Common error.
It's OK, come again:
We're in touch. This code works:
But according to C++ rules it should not allow access to protected (field of another object, albeit of the same class; protected denotes access only to inherited fields of the same object, while for access to alien fields it must be public). Is this a bug or a feature?
We turn. This is the code that works:
But according to C++ rules, it shouldn't allow access to protected at compile time. Is it a bug or a fix?
What do you mean it shouldn't? In what particular place? So your code is public inheritance (i.e. proctored members in descendants become public) and method is public.
s.w. rubbed my eyes, saw where, sorry)We turn. This is the code that works:
But according to C++ rules, it shouldn't allow access to protected at compile time. Is this a bug or a fix?
Yes, C++ online swears:https://onlinegdb.com/Hkv1_13EU
That's up to the developers.
Yes, C++ online swears:https://onlinegdb.com/Hkv1_13EU
That's up to the developers.
Yes, let's listen to the developers. I have now taken advantage of this convenient hole. If they close it, I'll have to look for other ways.