Errors, bugs, questions - page 1748
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
In your case, if you get very nerdy, you can pick on the bar creation mechanism, but not on CopyTicks.
I don't agree with you, because errors in logs, which I demonstrated in a branch about testing CopyTicks(), tell the opposite
Unfortunately, I don't understand the problem by the logs when there is no code.
Simply, the constant "1" in the b.f( 1 ) call is interpreted as int. Do an explicit conversion and everything will work:
b.f( (uint)1 );
The question was: what's wrong with B::f(uint)? (implicit conversion).
I'd like to add: why does the compiler need to analyze protected\private sections in this case at all if you can do without them?
There is a seemingly insignificant private case and a more general one. At first I did not pay much attention to this difference from C++ but in time I came to the conclusion that it is more essential. The simplest examples may not reveal the whole point.
I have made a tick indicator in kodobase. But I can't attach the source files - I press "Attach files", the inscription disappears, but the interface for selecting files doesn't appear.
Chrome must have glitched. Try using IE.