Errors, bugs, questions - page 1748

[[Deleted]]

fxsaber:

In your case, if you get very nerdy, you can pick on the bar creation mechanism, but not on CopyTicks.

I don't agree with you, because errors in logs, which I demonstrated in a branch about testing of CopyTicks(), show the opposite. And... what are you talking about? Are we making some kind of assumptions here, like "will it get / won't it get"? You're the one who complained a few posts above about the problem!? What difference does it make then? So what if one tick overtakes the other, what difference does it make!?

[[Deleted]]

fxsaber:

However, your post did give me an idea. Perhaps the tic problems you and I have are not so different...

[fxsaber]

Alexey Kozitsyn:
I don't agree with you, because errors in logs, which I demonstrated in a branch about testing CopyTicks(), tell the opposite

Unfortunately, I don't understand the problem on logs, when there is no code.

[[Deleted]]

fxsaber:
Unfortunately, I don't understand the problem by the logs when there is no code.

I have described the problem, yes, with the code I am only in the CD, there are several files.

[A100]

fSergei Vladimirov:

Simply, the constant "1" in the b.f( 1 ) call is interpreted as int. Do an explicit conversion and everything will work:

b.f( (uint)1 ); 

The question was: what's wrong with B::f(uint)? (implicit conversion).

I'd like to add: why does the compiler need to analyze protected\private sections in this case at all if you can do without them?

There is a seemingly insignificant private case and a more general one. At first I did not pay much attention to this difference from C++ but in time I came to the conclusion that it is more essential. The simplest examples may not reveal the whole point.

[Sergei Vladimirov]

Yes, I understand your question. There's a function with a better signature, but it can't be called because it's protected. Yes, the behaviour is different from studio: in MKL, it turns out, there's stricter type control (in this case). I don't know if that should be considered a bug. If you control the type of the argument passed to the function, there is no problem.

[fxsaber]

I have made a tick indicator in kodobase. But I can't attach the sources - I press "Attach files", the inscription disappears, but the interface for selecting files doesn't appear.

[Vladimir Karputov]

fxsaber:
I have made a tick indicator in kodobase. But I can't attach the source files - I press "Attach files", the inscription disappears, but the interface for selecting files doesn't appear.

It seems that Chrome is glitchy. Try using IE.

[Andrey Dik]

Why does the compiler only report unused variables in functions? It would be very convenient to see unused variables throughout the project.

[fxsaber]

Vladimir Karputov:
Chrome must have glitched. Try using IE.

Seems to be restricted in rights. That's a shame.