1200 subscribers!!! - page 154
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Why refer people here to blatant bullshit?
The phrase in the article"I have no doubt whatsoever that this is a "drawn" graph." -- unsubstantiated bullshit.
Well, and the phrase "fraudulent broker" -- what is that?
p.s. I don't mind reading the local (at times hilarious) interjection of "fraud" style -- but I'd like to see some justification for the claims.
Otherwise, it's all empty talk.
To prove fraud, you have to have complete information.
I.e. all dates of subscription, who signed up but did not pay, and who paid, who trades where and how much invested.
The thing is that there are a lot of good signals with the same results, but no one subscribes to them. That is the problem.
I.e., if there is no full information -- then we'll justify shouting "crook" by saying"I have no doubt whatsoever that this is ..."
There has to be a justification - at least a minimum one.This is only a guess, but the proof will be when the necessary information is available.
Of course not everyone in the top is a scammer, but it doesn't happen that even the best signal just picks up so many subscribers. It doesn't happen, I've already checked.
It means that there is not a level playing field for providers.
What are you talking about now? What percentage of trading strategies and accounts are losing? 1% or 99%?
Answer that question yourself in front of a mirror and make sure the mirror doesn't make you laugh.
I'm not at all an advocate of leaking signals and their suppliers -- but reading the unsubstantiated stuff in this thread is frankly sickening.
No one is forcing you to read, much less react. But for some reason you're busting your ass for them all the time. I remember a couple of years ago, there was Yegor Vlasov. He had a cool housekeeping story, too. I think he got busted back then... I remember you busting your ass like that, saying "where's the proof?"
They don't say anything, and you, Andryusha, you work...
Both in signals and in the marketplace, the rules are such that many hustling users have learned how to cheat their way to the top and lure so many subscribers or customers.
And the further we go, the more and more of them there are. But for some reason nothing is being done about it.
Apparently, you are stung by the fact that no one subscribes to your cent signals, which open and close almost every week).
Create a stable signals with at least a year history and you will have subscribers, and the administration will deal with scammers.
You must be stung by the fact that no one subscribes to your cent signals, which open and close almost every week).
Create a stable signals with at least a year of history and you will have subscribers, and the administration will deal with cheaters.
O-ba-na. Egor Vlasov's victim popped up. You were the one who supported the topic, saying that yes, he is a fraud and no one is doing anything. And now you're saying, "the administration will figure it out." Well, well. Life - just hang in there.
I remember you wrote in the thread that you wrote to servicedesk on the occasion of Yegor Vlasov... Or you didn't write anywhere? Trying to drown out the thread?
You must be stung by the fact that no one subscribes to your cent signals, which open and close almost every week).
You should create a stable signals with at least a year history and you will have subscribers, and the administration will deal with scammers.
Better look at yourself, I don't have cent accounts.
O-ba-na. Egor Vlasov's victim popped up. You are the one who supported the topic, that he is a fraud and no one is doing anything. And now you're saying, "the administration will sort it out." Well, well. Life - just hang in there.
I remember you wrote in the thread that you wrote to servicedesk on the occasion of Yegor Vlasov... Or you didn't write anywhere? Trying to drown out the thread?
Yes, I did. I got an answer, thank you. We'll look into it. I'm not allowed to write anything else now?
I think they deleted an entire thread when we asked them to check this person's honesty. It's best not to question the competence of the site's administration here. I think they know everything... probably.