Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 1657
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It is painful to watch how you do not understand what you are being told
The indicator draws the curves, well, hooray! - but it's not hooray! (С) - I think it's a cartoon about Prostokvashino))
They write me something like this:
"the indicator draws the curves, well, hooray!-(C) - it seems to be a cartoon about Prostokvashino )))".
People write to me something like this:
"the indicator draws the curves, hooray!-(C) - it seems a cartoon about Prostokvashino )))".
Don't cling to the words, although I don't mind, it's up to you.
I have already written about the article, about the series of losses and profits, I think I also wrote to you, I see no point in repeating myself, but alas, this is the basis of the trading system, and not "crooked" and "mesmerizing
;)
Don't cling to the words, although I don't mind, it's up to you.
I have already written about the article, about the series of losses and profits, I think I also wrote to you, I see no point in repeating myself, but alas, this is the basis of the trading system, and not "crookedness" and "mesmerizing
;)
There is no trading system. There is no trading system.
This is a neural network, it can learn something and then produce something in the real market. The very fact that it has learned and outputs something is very interesting and worth the attention of those who actually do it. Maybe this will become a trading system, and maybe not.
This forum thread is called "Machine Learning in Trading: Theory and Practice (Trading and Not Only)". I'm talking about "not only".
The very fact that it is trained and that something gives very interesting and worth the attention of those who are actually engaged in it.
Well, not surprised at all, according to Maxim's posts in this thread, he posted "tutorials" on the alglib, the codes are compact and can be used without problems
the series of articles on NS is also noteworthy, but they use R - I don't usehttps://www.mql5.com/ru/users/vlad1949/publications
OK, the purpose of communication is not clear, OK - surprise!
)))
They write me something like this:
"well, the indicator draws curves, well, hooray!-(C) - it seems a cartoon about Prostokvashino ))).
ahahahah )) cheered up ))
Opened the article on the advice of Igor Makanu
https://www.mql5.com/ru/articles/1530
Listed immediately to the "conclusions" and I liked one)
"Let's end this article with a very tough question: maybe the analytical part of the vast majority of TSs is useless, and the main efforts should be focused on efficient and sound money management techniques ("Analytics is nothing, money management is everything else!")?"
Opened the article on the advice of Igor Makanu
https://www.mql5.com/ru/articles/1530
Listed immediately to the "conclusions" and I liked one)
"Let's end this article with a very tough question: maybe the analytical part of the vast majority of TS is useless, and the main efforts should be focused on efficient and sound money management techniques ("Analytics is nothing, money management is everything else!")?"
I don't agree with that. The point is that analytics is primary, and money management is designed solely to improve the statistics obtained. And even if the statistics have zero profit, it can be slightly corrected in some cases by means of kamital management. So analytics is primary, MM is secondary. I'll give you an example later, if I understand you correctly.
Well, not surprised at all, according to Maxim's posts in this thread, he posted "tutorials" on the alglib, the codes are compact and can be used without problems
the series of articles on NS is also noteworthy, but they use R - I don't usehttps://www.mql5.com/ru/users/vlad1949/publications
OK, the purpose of communication is not clear, OK - surprise!
)))
I'm not trying to measure myself or surprise anyone! You're just sick...
Eugene, pay attention that no one here calls you names, that's one. Secondly, everyone is happy about your successes. Thirdly, they have no practical application. Question: Then what is all your work for?