Hunting for Stop Losses - page 10
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
+100% Exactly, stops are the energy that sets the markets in motion. And they are hunted, only not by specific people and organisations, but by the market as an element. Not out of malice, but by virtue of its structure. It cannot do otherwise.
The price goes up, not because they buy, but because it beats out the sellers' stops. It is sellers, not buyers that make the price go up. You can see it very well in the pictures of Oanda during the powerful moves.
If bears' stops are triggered, this may cause an upside movement and bullish stops will be triggered later and this will go up and down forever. This is almost all you need to know to create the Grail.The energy loss on each movement does not let the chart degenerate into a "saw-tooth" in the end, though it tends to do so. Plus, fractality adds to the complexity. That is why all market charts, of all times and at all dimensions look like this and not otherwise.
The process takes place on different dimensions, starting from ticks and upwards to infinity and it is important not to confuse them, trading strictly in the chosen dimension. There is nothing else in the markets and never has been, except this simple process.Why do you consider stoplosses as a driving factor, what about stop buy or stop sell, is it a trifle that you do not have to pay attention to?
As for demand, nobody paid attention to it.
Why do you so unequivocally consider stoplosses to be a driving factor, but what about stop buy or stop sell, are they little things you don't have to pay attention to?
In spheroconic "demand", and all that sell/buy, there is no inevitability and no energy accordingly. Only hadcor, that is stoplosses, create uncompromising and inevitable superdemand and have energy. The demand you have in mind and the sels/bays are want/need, and there is no escaping the stoploss, like it, dislike it, and have to sell. (And not just somewhere you have to sell, at the dictate of your left heel, but in quite certain places on the chart! And so from time to time) If you do not set a stop explicitly, it will still be in the size of the depo.
/Don't you see, the importance of the highlighted ... Isn't it great? There was the "human factor", millions of participants, with their own cockroaches, desires and wishes.Uncertain system, non-stationarity, and all that, guess when people want to buy or sell. But then, the market and synergy forces everyone into a very narrow framework, where they can not fail to sell. And with friendship and songs. Whether they want to or not, even at a loss, they will sell. As grandpa Neo used to say, it's as inevitable as peeing. That's the demand, that's the demand.
In spheroconic "demand", and all those sells/bays, there is no inevitability and no energy accordingly. Only hadcor, that is stoplosses, create uncompromising and inevitable superdemand and have energy. The demand you have in mind and the sels/bays are want/need, and there is no escaping the stoploss, like it, dislike it, and have to sell. You don't put it out obviously, it will still be in the size of the depo.
You are clearly not telling the whole story.
Strong level has the property of rebound and equally of breakdown.
Why is it that your philosophy is dominated by breakdowns?
Clearly, there is something you are not telling us explicitly.
A strong level has the property of a rebound and equally of a breakdown.
Why is it that your philosophy is dominated by breakdowns?
Maybe you should start with a breakout and then go back to the breakout level and rebound from it.
There is a theory that price is heading towards the stops, but that's probably a legend, is it or not, comment?
Judging by the way my stops are picking up, yes, they are.)