Live Testing reports - page 5

 

Currency : (usdjpy, usdchf, gbpusd, eurjpy,)

1. Timeframe: (M15)

2. Broker: (InterbankFX)

3. Settings file: Default

4. Account: (demo)

5. Version: (P5.6.03)

6. Mode: (3)

Comments : (started demo nov 13.) It works very well.

 

Raffa

As promised mid week results

Currency : usdjpy, usdjpy, usdchf, gbpjpy, eurjpy

1. Timeframe: M15

2. Broker: Interbak

3. Settings file: inside

4. Account: demo

5. Version: P5.6.04

6. Mode 3

Comments : started demo sunday at 1.06 AM GMT

6trade opened since.

3 $/JPY monday at 3:00 AM GMT

3 GB/JPY Tuesday 00:30 AM GMT

The 3 $/JPY still on fire now at 11h45 PM GMT for : -4 (x3)

2 GB/JPY closed SL hited at 11:00 AM GMT to day for : -33 x 2

1 GB on the fire for now : +2

I had also 6 trade (usd/chf, eur/jpy) opened before closing friday .Theses trade are posi for :+ 162 pips

Total closed : +2.29 $

On fire : + 127,58 $

See you

 
psnw:
Now, ....why would today's swap show up on a report generated for the last week. The open trade that I am in today, has nothing to do with trades from lastweek. Go back and reread my long post, look at the statements and pay particular attention to the open trade line, the ticket number, date trade opened and price close amount.

Swaps are paid buy trader if you have position overnight.

You have had this position over the weekend.

So on monday broker 'kind of closed your friday position charged you swap money and reopened same position for you with you settings of TP and SL but with new date(open on monday).

So it is like broker doesn't want to wait for you to close your position but he wants to cash in his swaps after the weekend.It maybe even more expensive to keep positon over weekend then overnight

it is called swap actually it maybe roollover..........

cheers

 
 

Thank you

daraknor:
I'm so happy to see everyone coming through so well! I need to post my own results as well so other people can see.

Thank you to take the leadership on Phoenix.

Robert

 

i am really new to phoenix and now i am running to demo testing real time on 15mins timeframe with phoenix 5.6.03 version with interbank and mig demo server. I have discovered that even though both using default setting, they came out different positions, and the best performance is interbank(which i do not prefer as their pips spread is 3pips compared to mig only 2 pips) Do you guys having same results like me? is the selecting of brokers very important? until now which is the best performance and my concern is even though it performs well in demo, i believe real account server will be much different compare to the demo server. How should we overcome this?thank you.

 

Stats tool

I have make a little statistics tool based on the optimisation tool result of metatrader. You can see the best profit with parmeters and profit on Phoenix_5_6_03.mq4.

see here : http://etherny.no-ip.org/forex/graphs/test1.php

Lots = 1

Order by decrease profit

Green : risk ok

Red (orange) : take carre !

Exemple the 82's have good profit with a little risk !

Here a result exemple from metatrader imported in my database.

testoptimiz.zip

Files:
testoptimiz.zip  33 kb
 

Currency : (usdjpy, chfjpy, gbpusd)

1. Timeframe: (M15)

2. Broker: (FXDD)

3. Settings file: (none)

4. Account: (live)

5. Version: (P5.6.03 and P4.2.03)

6. Mode: (1)

7. Pips: (+167)

Comments : (Lot size differs as I have used various MM settings. The account is not demo)

 

Statement this week

Currency : (usdjpy, usdchf, gbpusd, gbpjpy, eurjpy,)

1. Timeframe: (M15)

2. Broker: (InterbankFX)

3. Settings file: Default

4. Account: (demo)

5. Version: (P5.6.04)

6. Mode: (3)

Well... sometime I don't understand (had you ?!?!) how P5 "think"...

To go long on us/jpy on Thusrday = ??? We saw what happened...

Or have we, as Hendrick seem to suggest it in his last post, that we have to ACT when we "see" how are the things ???

Files:
 
Files:
5_6_04.gif  5 kb
5_6_04.htm  14 kb
Reason: