交易:
263
盈利交易:
251 (95.43%)
亏损交易:
12 (4.56%)
最好交易:
25.13 USD
最差交易:
-22.64 USD
毛利:
440.47 USD
(47 695 pips)
毛利亏损:
-103.98 USD
(8 838 pips)
最大连续赢利:
58 (64.02 USD)
最大连续盈利:
94.82 USD (53)
夏普比率:
0.41
交易活动:
3.99%
最大入金加载:
10.50%
最近交易:
10 几小时前
每周交易:
6
平均持有时间:
2 小时
采收率:
14.84
长期交易:
158 (60.08%)
短期交易:
105 (39.92%)
利润因子:
4.24
预期回报:
1.28 USD
平均利润:
1.75 USD
平均损失:
-8.67 USD
最大连续失误:
2 (-12.42 USD)
最大连续亏损:
-22.64 USD (1)
每月增长:
2.49%
年度预测:
30.18%
算法交易:
99%
结余跌幅:
绝对:
0.04 USD
最大值:
22.68 USD (5.66%)
相对跌幅:
结余:
8.05% (10.26 USD)
净值:
17.52% (66.89 USD)
分配
| 交易品种 | 交易 | Sell | Buy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XAUUSD | 259 | |||
| CHINA50 | 4 | |||
|
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
275
300
|
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
275
300
|
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
275
300
|
| 交易品种 | 毛利, USD | 损失, USD | 利润, USD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XAUUSD | 335 | |||
| CHINA50 | 2 | |||
|
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
| 交易品种 | 毛利, pips | 损失, pips | 利润, pips | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XAUUSD | 36K | |||
| CHINA50 | 2.9K | |||
|
10K
20K
30K
40K
50K
60K
|
10K
20K
30K
40K
50K
60K
|
10K
20K
30K
40K
50K
60K
|
- 入金加载
- 提取
最好交易:
+25.13
USD
最差交易:
-23
USD
最大连续赢利:
53
最大连续失误:
1
最大连续盈利:
+64.02
USD
最大连续亏损:
-12.42
USD
基于有关不同交易商真实账户的执行统计的平均滑移点按点数指定。它取决于 ICMarketsSC-MT5-4 提供商以及订阅者之间不同的报价,以及订单执行的延迟。值越低意味着复制的质量越高。
|
itexsys-Platform
|
0.00 × 1 | |
|
ThreeTrader-Live
|
0.00 × 1 | |
|
Winprofx-Live
|
0.00 × 1 | |
|
VantageInternational-Live 5
|
0.00 × 1 | |
|
GlobalPrime-Trade
|
0.00 × 1 | |
|
Exness-MT5Real25
|
0.00 × 1 | |
|
Exness-MT5Real18
|
0.00 × 1 | |
|
ICMarkets-MT5
|
0.00 × 1 | |
|
Exness-MT5Real10
|
0.00 × 1 | |
|
JunoMarkets-Server
|
0.00 × 1 | |
|
BridgeMarkets-MT5
|
0.17 × 6 | |
|
ExclusiveMarkets-Live
|
0.94 × 33 | |
|
Exness-MT5Real2
|
1.00 × 1 | |
|
GOMarketsIntl-Live
|
1.00 × 1 | |
|
GOMarketsMU-Live
|
1.85 × 111 | |
|
STARTRADERINTL-Live
|
2.00 × 3 | |
|
ICMarketsAU-Live
|
2.00 × 1 | |
|
ICMarketsEU-MT5-4
|
2.60 × 98 | |
|
ICMarketsSC-MT5-2
|
2.90 × 7721 | |
|
ForexClubBY-MT5 Real Server
|
3.13 × 82 | |
|
ICTrading-MT5-4
|
3.64 × 69 | |
|
TradeMaxGlobal-Live2
|
3.80 × 46 | |
|
XMGlobal-MT5 8
|
4.00 × 1 | |
|
BTGTMauritiusCapital-MT5-LIVE2
|
4.00 × 13 | |
|
BlueberryMarkets-Live02
|
4.24 × 25 | |
GoldWave – 專業波段與趨勢交易信號
GoldWave 是一款高精準度的自動化交易信號系統,主要聚焦於 XAUUSD(黃金)。
基於多層動能與波動率分析,它專注於穩定成長與風險可控。
重要提示:
由于交易品种名称 XAUUAD+ 带有 “+” 后缀,因此可能无法被正常复制。如果您的经纪商品种名称属于这种类型,我建议您考虑更换为像 IC Markets 这样较为知名的经纪商,以获得更稳定的跟单体验、更好的执行以及更低的滑点。
另外,对于这个信号,一般建议账户余额至少为 1,000 美元。这样会有更充足的空间来覆盖订阅费用,也更有机会获得相对理想的交易结果。
如果资金过小,可能较难覆盖订阅成本,或者难以获得令人满意的收益。这种情况更多与账户资金规模和交易条件有关,而不完全是信号本身的问题。
非常感谢您的理解。
技術特點
-
完全自動化策略,專為黃金優化
-
平均持倉時間:1–2 小時
-
無馬丁、無網格、無加倉,每筆交易獨立執行
-
智慧風險過濾系統,有效避開高波動新聞行情
策略概覽
-
歷史勝率:超過 85%
-
平均月報酬:5–10%(在穩定市況下)
-
目前最大回撤:低於 20%
-
在趨勢或突破行情中表現最佳
建議條件
-
最低資金:500 美元以上
-
推薦槓桿:1:200
-
帳戶類型:ECN 或 Raw Spread(低延遲執行)
重要說明
此信號強調 品質勝於頻率,每月約產生 10–50 筆高品質交易,皆為風險報酬比最優的機會。
適合追求穩健、理性操作的黃金投資者。
短期波動屬正常情況,但長期曲線穩步向上。
信号
价格
成长
订阅者
资金
结余
周
EA交易
交易
赢%
活动
PF
预期回报
提取
杠杆
not within my specification
When we remove the EA from the trade to hide the performance of DD I do not recommend at all!
Goldwave is great.. just costs so much. So I tried this signal. Here are my results for the first month. Coinexx w/ NYCServers VPS ( under 2ms ping always)
Profit trades: +$1087
Loss trades: -$2730
Total: -$1643
By far the worst performing thing on my account. The trades are not reflecting real market conditions. I just cannot afford it. Currently in over-$300 drawdown on 0.08 lot XauUsd. The inital risk of this is almost infinte. I'm lucky this didn't blow the account with reckless entries, and $4,000 stop loss.
Of course none of these losses show on the Signal account. Just another scam, finding 20 friends to give it 5 stars!
我正在持续盈利,很不错的信号,国内的朋友可以相互交流一下VX:zxkj68688
Already subscribe 1 week, but equity is negative. 死扛 是無用, 好消耗 時間成本
Jul 26, 2026 (Sun): 2 positions held over weekend that were opened right before Friday market close. Didn't author recently update EA to specifically avoid this?
Aug 1, 2026 (Sat): Another weekend holding considerable losing position. Seems no SL, actual or hidden. Now hoping for favorable market open on Monday.
why is ths signal deviating from its described logic- only one trade at a time? AT weekend it opened two buy and sell gold trades simultaneously when it should better stop traing as market i going to be closed.
I have been following this signal and it was very solid until a minor EA glitch on 17/7. The developer was extremely responsive, explained the situation perfectly, and is updating the EA with stricter daily limits to prevent it from happening again. Great to see a developer who actually listens to feedback and improves the system. Looking forward to the new updates!
I experienced a slight loss at first, but it subsequently recovered excellently with much larger profits. I will leave a review after using it for one month.
The signal works great. I noticed some people writing that it doesn't work on XAUUSD+. Usually, MQL5 filters out the "+" suffix automatically, so it should work fine. Even if it doesn't, that is not an issue with the signal itself. Leaving a bad review for that is not fair.
I have been looking for good signals for a long time, but hadn't found anything solid until now. I don't know how Shengzu Zhong does it, but this signal has a real edge and delivers results. While 99% of the signals here on MQL5 are not very good, this one is two levels above the rest. It clearly plays in the top league. The fact that 127 people have already subscribed—and the number is still growing—shows that it works.
The main question is how long it will continue to perform this well. Another thing to consider is what happens during a drawdown. The maximum drawdown is supposedly only 20%. However, if two drawdowns happen close together, the profits will quickly be wiped out.
The developer has created two top-tier signals that are almost too good to be true. I have been testing this one for about four weeks now. Let's hope it keeps running like this for at least another six months. My advice to anyone using it is to set your Stop Loss (SL) to 20% or 25%.
Subscribed ~2 months but never copied a single trade — the cause is a broker symbol mismatch, not the strategy. The provider trades gold as plain XAUUSD (forex-classified, IC Markets). My broker (Vantage) lists gold as XAUUSD+, classified as a CFD. MetaTrader's copier only auto-maps symbol names for forex-classified instruments, so every trade was rejected with "symbol XAUUSD not found." Both MQL5 and my broker confirmed it can't be fixed subscriber-side. Heads-up for anyone on a broker whose gold is a suffixed CFD symbol (XAUUSD+, XAUUSD.r): this signal won't copy — check your gold symbol's exact name and margin classification before subscribing. I couldn't evaluate the strategy itself, but the public track record looks strong.
Bonjour, tout fonctionne parfaitement depuis que je suis inscrit il y a deux semaines. Je recommande
欢迎中国朋友一起跟单交流v hsudyu
i use vantage,and its been 4 days not coping ,could be bacause of slippage
Good
Can anyone guide?
I have subscribed this provider by my trades are not copying in XAUUSD pair?
Am i missing something?
The GoldWave signal linked to the GoldWave EA started off performing well in the early phase. At that time, results were consistent and seemed aligned with prevailing market conditions, which likely supported its initial performance.
However, over the last month (March) and continuing into the current period, the behavior has noticeably changed. The consistency is no longer the same, and performance appears less stable compared to the earlier phase. This raises concerns about how well the strategy adapts to evolving market conditions.
From a cost perspective, the subscription pricing has also been increasing, which makes it harder to justify, especially for smaller accounts. In my view, it may not be suitable for accounts below roughly $3,000–$5,000, as the risk exposure relative to account size becomes less efficient.
Even for larger accounts, while the risk remains manageable for now, there is still uncertainty. A single strong adverse move or a drawdown period could potentially erase a significant portion of gains, depending on position sizing and market conditions.
Overall, while the system showed promise initially, the recent performance changes combined with increasing subscription costs make the risk-to-reward balance less attractive in my opinion.
The quality of trades are good but the profit is so less. Even didn't cover the subscription. I'm not gonna renovate it.
Trades seldom and with small profit, you have to apply bigger lot, thus making trades risky. Dont reccomend.
steady