GoldWave signal

not trade

refund i cancelled it already.

Very good. Some slippage using ICMarketsSC.

not within my specification

When we remove the EA from the trade to hide the performance of DD I do not recommend at all!

Goldwave is great.. just costs so much. So I tried this signal. Here are my results for the first month. Coinexx w/ NYCServers VPS ( under 2ms ping always)

Profit trades: +$1087

Loss trades: -$2730

Total: -$1643

By far the worst performing thing on my account. The trades are not reflecting real market conditions. I just cannot afford it. Currently in over-$300 drawdown on 0.08 lot XauUsd. The inital risk of this is almost infinte. I'm lucky this didn't blow the account with reckless entries, and $4,000 stop loss.

Of course none of these losses show on the Signal account. Just another scam, finding 20 friends to give it 5 stars!

我正在持续盈利，很不错的信号，

Already subscribe 1 week, but equity is negative. 死扛 是無用, 好消耗 時間成本

why is ths signal deviating from its described logic- only one trade at a time? AT weekend it opened two buy and sell gold trades simultaneously when it should better stop traing as market i going to be closed.

I have been following this signal and it was very solid until a minor EA glitch on 17/7. The developer was extremely responsive, explained the situation perfectly, and is updating the EA with stricter daily limits to prevent it from happening again. Great to see a developer who actually listens to feedback and improves the system. Looking forward to the new updates!

I experienced a slight loss at first, but it subsequently recovered excellently with much larger profits. I will leave a review after using it for one month.

The signal works great. I noticed some people writing that it doesn't work on XAUUSD+. Usually, MQL5 filters out the "+" suffix automatically, so it should work fine. Even if it doesn't, that is not an issue with the signal itself. Leaving a bad review for that is not fair.

I have been looking for good signals for a long time, but hadn't found anything solid until now. I don't know how Shengzu Zhong does it, but this signal has a real edge and delivers results. While 99% of the signals here on MQL5 are not very good, this one is two levels above the rest. It clearly plays in the top league. The fact that 127 people have already subscribed—and the number is still growing—shows that it works.

The main question is how long it will continue to perform this well. Another thing to consider is what happens during a drawdown. The maximum drawdown is supposedly only 20%. However, if two drawdowns happen close together, the profits will quickly be wiped out.

The developer has created two top-tier signals that are almost too good to be true. I have been testing this one for about four weeks now. Let's hope it keeps running like this for at least another six months. My advice to anyone using it is to set your Stop Loss (SL) to 20% or 25%.

Subscribed ~2 months but never copied a single trade — the cause is a broker symbol mismatch, not the strategy. The provider trades gold as plain XAUUSD (forex-classified, IC Markets). My broker (Vantage) lists gold as XAUUSD+, classified as a CFD. MetaTrader's copier only auto-maps symbol names for forex-classified instruments, so every trade was rejected with "symbol XAUUSD not found." Both MQL5 and my broker confirmed it can't be fixed subscriber-side. Heads-up for anyone on a broker whose gold is a suffixed CFD symbol (XAUUSD+, XAUUSD.r): this signal won't copy — check your gold symbol's exact name and margin classification before subscribing. I couldn't evaluate the strategy itself, but the public track record looks strong.

Bonjour, tout fonctionne parfaitement depuis que je suis inscrit il y a deux semaines. Je recommande

欢迎中国朋友一起跟单交流v hsudyu

i use vantage,and its been 4 days not coping ,could be bacause of slippage

Good

Can anyone guide?

I have subscribed this provider by my trades are not copying in XAUUSD pair?

Am i missing something?

The GoldWave signal linked to the GoldWave EA started off performing well in the early phase. At that time, results were consistent and seemed aligned with prevailing market conditions, which likely supported its initial performance.

However, over the last month (March) and continuing into the current period, the behavior has noticeably changed. The consistency is no longer the same, and performance appears less stable compared to the earlier phase. This raises concerns about how well the strategy adapts to evolving market conditions.

From a cost perspective, the subscription pricing has also been increasing, which makes it harder to justify, especially for smaller accounts. In my view, it may not be suitable for accounts below roughly $3,000–$5,000, as the risk exposure relative to account size becomes less efficient.

Even for larger accounts, while the risk remains manageable for now, there is still uncertainty. A single strong adverse move or a drawdown period could potentially erase a significant portion of gains, depending on position sizing and market conditions.

Overall, while the system showed promise initially, the recent performance changes combined with increasing subscription costs make the risk-to-reward balance less attractive in my opinion.

The quality of trades are good but the profit is so less. Even didn't cover the subscription. I'm not gonna renovate it.