XAU Pulse EA

Unfortunately, I cannot recommend this EA. I purchased it in March 2026 and have been running it on a demo since then. Normally I do not run a demo for such a long time, but it really has never convinced me, so I am cutting it off today. It made a whopping 21.7% the first week, it went up, down, up, and down again. Currently it is sitting at 15.2% plus, but it was up as much as 42%. Risk 2.5% on iCT. I gave it ample time, but.... Another A bites the dust.

I bought the XAU Pulse EA quite a while ago now, and I’m still very satisfied with it. What really makes it stand out from other EAs is the absence of a trailing stop. This gives trades much more room to breathe and avoids so many unnecessary stop-outs caused by market noise. At the same time, I also bought several other EAs using trailing stops, and honestly, this one clearly stands out from the others over time. The strategy feels much more stable and better designed for real market conditions. Of course, there are periods where performance can be slower or less favorable, but in the end, the results are definitely there. That’s simply part of trading, and this EA handles market conditions far better than many others I’ve tested. The absence of a trailing stop also requires a certain amount of patience and composure, especially during temporary drawdowns, but in my experience, it really pays off over time. I’ve seen some people asking for a trailing stop to be added, but I honestly think they would regret it very quickly. They just need to compare the signal results with and without a trailing stop to clearly see the difference over time. The current approach is exactly what makes this EA different and effective in the long run. Some negative comments also seem to come from people who expect instant results without really understanding how trading works over the long term. Consistency and risk management matter much more than chasing quick profits. Honestly, I also don’t understand people who leave a review after only one week of use — that’s simply not enough time to properly evaluate a trading system. In the end, I’ve largely recovered my initial investment, which says a lot about the quality of this EA. Another thing I really appreciate is that the developer is always available to answer questions and provide support when needed, which is rare these days. He also genuinely seems like an experienced trader, not just another seller trying to market an EA.

Great work from the developer!

The EA has been updated, and the trading results have improved. I am now using the breakeven function. The author listens to users’ feedback and suggestions.

I’ve been testing this EA for the past month, and honestly the results have been extremely disappointing. Out of 11 trades, only 1 was a winner. That’s not just a bad period — that’s a serious consistency issue. I gave it time, I didn’t rush to judge after a few trades, but the performance speaks for itself. The strategy doesn’t seem robust at all. Either it’s heavily over-optimized on backtests or it simply can’t handle real market conditions. What’s even more concerning is that the losses are not balanced by the occasional win, so the equity curve just keeps going down. I always accept that trading involves risk, but here we’re not talking about normal drawdown — we’re talking about a system that, at least in my experience, fails to deliver even a minimum level of reliability. At this point, I’ve stopped using it. Definitely not recommended.

Wie es immer so ist... Sobald man den EA live einsetzt hagelt es Verluste... Wobei ich bemerkt habe dass es durchaus sinnvoll wäre wenn der Programmierer eine Trailing Option einführen würde. Die Trades laufen nahezu immer in den Gewinn um dann im Verlust zu schließen...

I tested this EA for several weeks on demo and now I have it running on a small live account. Its a great scalper EA with clear logic and really low DD (less then 10%) on small risk (2%). I can recommend this without any doubt. The developer is quite responsive and provides superb support.

This is a report on the performance of a live account one week after purchase. Since it has only been one week, please do not take this as a definitive conclusion, but rather as a progress report at this stage. First, this EA’s strategy relies solely on breakouts, take-profit (TP), and stop-loss (SL) levels; results are determined purely by wins and losses, with no trailing stop function. A clear difference compared to EAs like Akali, QV, and Agera is that limit orders are triggered at levels close to the current price. Since the risk-reward ratio is 1:2, the calculation suggests that as long as the win rate exceeds 50%, significant profits will be generated. During this one-week period, there have been 8 trades, 6 of which were winners, and I am currently seeing substantial profits. Personally, I believe the expected value is high, so I will continue trading with it. I will post another review in a month.

Update　2026.05.05

Since the start of May, I’ve lost every trade, so my profits haven’t grown significantly.

I think I need to take a long-term view.

I believe I need the patience to keep using this strategy, weathering the ups and downs of the market.

15/6/2026

Here’s my final conclusion.

I think I’ll keep using this.

I’ve been using it for about three months. Since it’s a breakout system, when the price stalls after a breakout, it hits the 100-pip stop-loss and ends up in the red.

However, the ratio of trades that reach the 200-pip take-profit to those that end at the stop-loss is at least 1:1, and if this ratio improves, it can result in significant profits.

With many other breakout systems, trades are often closed out with small profits using a trailing stop, but this one is different. Since there are times when you’ll experience a losing streak, patience is naturally required. However, if you practice risk management that allows you to endure without getting greedy, I believe this EA will generate significant profits in the long run.

If I’m still using it a year from now, I’ll be happy to post another review.