Jason Smith / Profile
- Information
|
1 year
experience
|
22
products
|
15
demo versions
|
|
2
jobs
|
0
signals
|
0
subscribers
|
The best algorithmic developers aren't just programmers - they're traders who code.
I develop and code custom trading strategies, automation tools and custom software across multiple platforms and languages, including TradingView (Pine Script), MetaTrader 5 (MQL5), Python, C, C++, PHP, JavaScript, Java, and other modern development frameworks.
Looking for a quantitative developer role.
I can turn trading strategies into fully functional systems.
Extensive experience with Linux (Gentoo, Debian) and Unix systems (FreeBSD, OpenBSD)
I’m available for projects.You can ask for me directly on Freelancer
How Observation Changes Outcomes :
In quantum mechanics, when light (or electrons) passes through two slits, it creates an interference pattern on the screen behind them.
Each particle seems to go through both slits at once, existing in a superposition of all possible paths and the resulting pattern reflects the probabilities of where the particle could land.
If you try to measure which slit the particle goes through, the interference pattern disappears.
Observing the particle forces it into a definite state - it goes through one slit or the other.
The act of measurement collapses the wave function and fundamentally changes the outcome.
Before you check a trade, it’s in superposition.
From a statistical perspective, your trade has a probability of winning or losing based on your system but you don’t yet know the outcome.
The trade is evolving naturally, just like a quantum system.
The moment you look at it, your observation collapses the “trade wave function” into a definite state - good or bad, winning or losing.
That observation triggers an emotional reaction — stress, fear, or overconfidence—which can cause you to break your plan, over-leverage, or revenge trade.
Just like in quantum mechanics, the act of measurement affects the system.
If you hadn’t looked, the system would have continued evolving naturally and you would have followed your plan without emotional interference.
This analogy mirrors the quantum concept perfectly - observation changes the outcome, not because the market changed, but because your interaction with it changed your behavior.
In other words, checking too often destroys the natural probabilistic outcome of your system, just like measuring the slit destroys the interference pattern.
The trade itself hasn’t changed; your observation changed how you interact with it, which changes the outcome.
Final Thoughts:
Traders, you know what I’m talking about — in a demo, you can leave your strategy untouched for days, weeks, even months.
The moment it goes live, you start checking too often, micromanaging your trades, and suddenly your observation is affecting the outcome.
I develop and code custom trading strategies, automation tools and custom software across multiple platforms and languages, including TradingView (Pine Script), MetaTrader 5 (MQL5), Python, C, C++, PHP, JavaScript, Java, and other modern development frameworks.
Looking for a quantitative developer role.
I can turn trading strategies into fully functional systems.
Extensive experience with Linux (Gentoo, Debian) and Unix systems (FreeBSD, OpenBSD)
I’m available for projects.You can ask for me directly on Freelancer
How Observation Changes Outcomes :
In quantum mechanics, when light (or electrons) passes through two slits, it creates an interference pattern on the screen behind them.
Each particle seems to go through both slits at once, existing in a superposition of all possible paths and the resulting pattern reflects the probabilities of where the particle could land.
If you try to measure which slit the particle goes through, the interference pattern disappears.
Observing the particle forces it into a definite state - it goes through one slit or the other.
The act of measurement collapses the wave function and fundamentally changes the outcome.
Before you check a trade, it’s in superposition.
From a statistical perspective, your trade has a probability of winning or losing based on your system but you don’t yet know the outcome.
The trade is evolving naturally, just like a quantum system.
The moment you look at it, your observation collapses the “trade wave function” into a definite state - good or bad, winning or losing.
That observation triggers an emotional reaction — stress, fear, or overconfidence—which can cause you to break your plan, over-leverage, or revenge trade.
Just like in quantum mechanics, the act of measurement affects the system.
If you hadn’t looked, the system would have continued evolving naturally and you would have followed your plan without emotional interference.
This analogy mirrors the quantum concept perfectly - observation changes the outcome, not because the market changed, but because your interaction with it changed your behavior.
In other words, checking too often destroys the natural probabilistic outcome of your system, just like measuring the slit destroys the interference pattern.
The trade itself hasn’t changed; your observation changed how you interact with it, which changes the outcome.
Final Thoughts:
Traders, you know what I’m talking about — in a demo, you can leave your strategy untouched for days, weeks, even months.
The moment it goes live, you start checking too often, micromanaging your trades, and suddenly your observation is affecting the outcome.
Friends
131
Requests
Outgoing
Jason Smith
Jason Smith
2026.03.18
The daily range has been very small over multiple days—yet Pro15 continues to generate consistent profits.
Jason Smith
Jason Smith
2026.03.18
The system is now self-improving, stable, and generating real signals. The model registry actually works, the risk management is solid, and it's been running for 180 cycles without issues.
Would I trust it? Yes. The consistent 0.67+ model score over 180 cycles proves it's not lucky - it's working.
Would I trust it? Yes. The consistent 0.67+ model score over 180 cycles proves it's not lucky - it's working.
Jason Smith
Jason Smith
2026.03.17
I’ve built the full Markov model setup — including a backtester, a Python bot that executes its signals, and an MQL5 version. Still more testing to run, but it’s starting to take shape. Keep an eye on this.
Jason Smith
Jason Smith
2026.03.17
RISK MANAGEMENT: Position Size: 93% of normal Risk Level: NORMAL Action: SELL VaR (95%): 0.37% Sharpe Ratio: -1.52
Jason Smith
I've built a production-ready HMM market regime detection system that runs live on MT5.
It analyzes 5 timeframes simultaneously, detects trend/mean-reverting/volatile regimes, and includes full risk management with VaR calculations, position sizing, and circuit breakers.
The infrastructure is solid - connection pooling, state recovery, encrypted database, real-time dashboards, WebSocket streaming. Backtester with optimizer included.
Looking for a quant developer role or freelance work.
It analyzes 5 timeframes simultaneously, detects trend/mean-reverting/volatile regimes, and includes full risk management with VaR calculations, position sizing, and circuit breakers.
The infrastructure is solid - connection pooling, state recovery, encrypted database, real-time dashboards, WebSocket streaming. Backtester with optimizer included.
Looking for a quant developer role or freelance work.
Jason Smith
MarkovMatrix -
├── markov.py # The CORE MODEL - HMM math, state detection
├── pythonBot.py # LIVE TRADING BOT - Runs 24/7, connects to MT5
├── backtester2.py # TESTING ENGINE - Finds winning parameters
├── show_results.py # RESULTS VIEWER - Displays backtest JSON files
└── run_all_tests.bat # AUTOMATION - Runs multiple tests in sequence
├── markov.py # The CORE MODEL - HMM math, state detection
├── pythonBot.py # LIVE TRADING BOT - Runs 24/7, connects to MT5
├── backtester2.py # TESTING ENGINE - Finds winning parameters
├── show_results.py # RESULTS VIEWER - Displays backtest JSON files
└── run_all_tests.bat # AUTOMATION - Runs multiple tests in sequence
Jason Smith
Traders, everything you see here is real.
Think you can prove me wrong?
Comment below and let’s debate it.
Think you can prove me wrong?
Comment below and let’s debate it.
Jason Smith
The first three traders to DM me can choose a product for free. Selection depends on your choice — you never know your luck!
Jason Smith
Bringing you the very latest in trading tools, exclusive to MQL5.com — the only marketplace in the world where you’ll find bots like this
Jason Smith
Providing top-tier professional Expert Advisors and advanced trading indicators.
I develop and code custom trading strategies across multiple platforms and languages, including TradingView (Pine Script), MetaTrader 5 (MQL5), Python, C, C++, PHP, JavaScript, Java, and other modern development frameworks.
You can ask for me directly on Freelancer
I develop and code custom trading strategies across multiple platforms and languages, including TradingView (Pine Script), MetaTrader 5 (MQL5), Python, C, C++, PHP, JavaScript, Java, and other modern development frameworks.
You can ask for me directly on Freelancer
Jason Smith
Markov Matrix -
Built-in HTTP Servers (3 of them!)
Server Port Purpose Technology
Main Dashboard 8080 Beautiful UI with charts Python http.server
Simple Dashboard 5000 Lightweight JSON view Python http.server
Prometheus 8000 Metrics for monitoring prometheus_client
Built-in HTTP Servers (3 of them!)
Server Port Purpose Technology
Main Dashboard 8080 Beautiful UI with charts Python http.server
Simple Dashboard 5000 Lightweight JSON view Python http.server
Prometheus 8000 Metrics for monitoring prometheus_client
Jason Smith
2026.03.13
📁 HMM Web Package
├── HTTP Server (Python built-in)
├── REST API Framework
├── WebSocket Server
├── Prometheus Exporter
├── OpenAPI Documentation
├── HTML Dashboard
├── CSS Stylesheets
├── JavaScript Client
└── SQLite Database Bridge
├── HTTP Server (Python built-in)
├── REST API Framework
├── WebSocket Server
├── Prometheus Exporter
├── OpenAPI Documentation
├── HTML Dashboard
├── CSS Stylesheets
├── JavaScript Client
└── SQLite Database Bridge
Jason Smith
Markov System -
⚙️ Built With:
├── Python 3.8+
├── MetaTrader 5 Integration
├── Hidden Markov Models
├── Multi-timeframe Consensus
├── Real-time WebSocket
└── SQLite Database
📊 Indicators Used:
├── RSI (14)
├── MFI (14)
├── Williams %R (14)
├── VWAP
├── Parkinson Volatility
└── Garman-Klass Volatility
⚙️ Built With:
├── Python 3.8+
├── MetaTrader 5 Integration
├── Hidden Markov Models
├── Multi-timeframe Consensus
├── Real-time WebSocket
└── SQLite Database
📊 Indicators Used:
├── RSI (14)
├── MFI (14)
├── Williams %R (14)
├── VWAP
├── Parkinson Volatility
└── Garman-Klass Volatility
: