|
1 year
experience
|
21
products
|
18
demo versions
|
|
2
jobs
|
0
signals
|
0
subscribers
|
The best algorithmic developers aren't just programmers - they're traders who code.
I develop and code custom trading strategies, automation tools and custom software across multiple platforms and languages, including TradingView (Pine Script), MetaTrader 5 (MQL5), Python and other modern development frameworks.
Looking for a quantitative developer role.
I can turn trading strategies into fully functional systems.
Extensive experience with Linux (Gentoo, Debian) and Unix systems (FreeBSD, OpenBSD)
I’m available for projects.
You can ask for me directly in the Freelance section.
How Observation Changes Outcomes :
In quantum mechanics, when light (or electrons) passes through two slits, it creates an interference pattern on the screen behind them.
Each particle seems to go through both slits at once, existing in a super position of all possible paths and the resulting pattern reflects the probabilities of where the particle could land.
If you try to measure which slit the particle goes through, the interference pattern disappears.
Observing the particle forces it into a definite state - it goes through one slit or the other.
The act of measurement collapses the wave function and fundamentally changes the outcome.
Before you check a trade, it’s in super position.
From a statistical perspective, your trade has a probability of winning or losing based on your system but you don’t yet know the outcome.
The trade is evolving naturally, just like a quantum system.
The moment you look at it, your observation collapses the “trade wave function” into a definite state - good or bad, winning or losing.
That observation triggers an emotional reaction — stress, fear, or overconfidence—which can cause you to break your plan, over-leverage, or revenge trade.
Just like in quantum mechanics, the act of measurement affects the system.
If you hadn’t looked, the system would have continued evolving naturally and you would have followed your plan without emotional interference.
This analogy mirrors the quantum concept perfectly - observation changes the outcome, not because the market changed, but because your interaction with it changed your behavior.
In other words, checking too often destroys the natural probabilistic outcome of your system, just like measuring the slit destroys the interference pattern.
The trade itself hasn’t changed; your observation changed how you interact with it, which changes the outcome.
Final Thoughts:
Traders, you know what I’m talking about — in a demo, you can leave your strategy untouched for days, weeks, even months.
The moment it goes live, you start checking too often, micromanaging your trades, and suddenly your observation is affecting the outcome
I develop and code custom trading strategies, automation tools and custom software across multiple platforms and languages, including TradingView (Pine Script), MetaTrader 5 (MQL5), Python and other modern development frameworks.
Looking for a quantitative developer role.
I can turn trading strategies into fully functional systems.
Extensive experience with Linux (Gentoo, Debian) and Unix systems (FreeBSD, OpenBSD)
I’m available for projects.
You can ask for me directly in the Freelance section.
How Observation Changes Outcomes :
In quantum mechanics, when light (or electrons) passes through two slits, it creates an interference pattern on the screen behind them.
Each particle seems to go through both slits at once, existing in a super position of all possible paths and the resulting pattern reflects the probabilities of where the particle could land.
If you try to measure which slit the particle goes through, the interference pattern disappears.
Observing the particle forces it into a definite state - it goes through one slit or the other.
The act of measurement collapses the wave function and fundamentally changes the outcome.
Before you check a trade, it’s in super position.
From a statistical perspective, your trade has a probability of winning or losing based on your system but you don’t yet know the outcome.
The trade is evolving naturally, just like a quantum system.
The moment you look at it, your observation collapses the “trade wave function” into a definite state - good or bad, winning or losing.
That observation triggers an emotional reaction — stress, fear, or overconfidence—which can cause you to break your plan, over-leverage, or revenge trade.
Just like in quantum mechanics, the act of measurement affects the system.
If you hadn’t looked, the system would have continued evolving naturally and you would have followed your plan without emotional interference.
This analogy mirrors the quantum concept perfectly - observation changes the outcome, not because the market changed, but because your interaction with it changed your behavior.
In other words, checking too often destroys the natural probabilistic outcome of your system, just like measuring the slit destroys the interference pattern.
The trade itself hasn’t changed; your observation changed how you interact with it, which changes the outcome.
Final Thoughts:
Traders, you know what I’m talking about — in a demo, you can leave your strategy untouched for days, weeks, even months.
The moment it goes live, you start checking too often, micromanaging your trades, and suddenly your observation is affecting the outcome
Jason Smith
Call of Duty (6) - Online Gaming
In the midst of chaos, there is also opportunity.
Treat your men like you would your own beloved sons, and they will follow you into the deepest valley.
In the midst of chaos, there is also opportunity.
Treat your men like you would your own beloved sons, and they will follow you into the deepest valley.
Jason Smith
New strategy —
I was thinking of either giving away the source code for free or releasing the EA as a free product.
Traders, what do you prefer: free source code or a free product?
I’ll explain how to use it properly, so don’t let the menu put you off.
It’s very easy to configure, and I can also provide some set files if you prefer.
There are a lot of different combinations available, and it works on Forex too.
When the vsAvg turns Aqua, the EA opens a trade and uses the D1 daily percentages as the bias direction.
You can configure the percentage threshold as a minimum, giving you control over how strong the daily bias needs to be before a trade is taken.
I was thinking of either giving away the source code for free or releasing the EA as a free product.
Traders, what do you prefer: free source code or a free product?
I’ll explain how to use it properly, so don’t let the menu put you off.
It’s very easy to configure, and I can also provide some set files if you prefer.
There are a lot of different combinations available, and it works on Forex too.
When the vsAvg turns Aqua, the EA opens a trade and uses the D1 daily percentages as the bias direction.
You can configure the percentage threshold as a minimum, giving you control over how strong the daily bias needs to be before a trade is taken.
Michael Arthur Schorr
2026.09.25
Personally the source code allows one to learn more about it however any of the twow ork to experience it
Jason Smith
2026.09.25
Thanks for your comment. I’ll either upload the EA as a free product, which will always remain free, or I’ll add the source code to the Codebase section. Let you know when its ready.
Jason Smith
I’m available for projects.
You can ask for me directly in the Freelance section.
If you’re unsure how to move forward, you could always watch Markov live through Investor or Trade copy into your demo account.
I’m not quite ready to do that yet, but it’s certainly an option.
With a demo account, there’s no real financial risk, so you can take as much time as you need to watch, learn, and see how it performs.
In gambling, many people can’t even handle a winning streak—they get carried away, increase their bets, and eventually blow everything they’ve made.
Whereas with this, the idea is to stay disciplined, manage the risk, and quietly compound the gains rather than throwing everything at the next trade.
And because it’s fully automated, there’s little to no psychology involved—no emotional decisions, no second-guessing, and no temptation to suddenly increase the risk.
You can ask for me directly in the Freelance section.
If you’re unsure how to move forward, you could always watch Markov live through Investor or Trade copy into your demo account.
I’m not quite ready to do that yet, but it’s certainly an option.
With a demo account, there’s no real financial risk, so you can take as much time as you need to watch, learn, and see how it performs.
In gambling, many people can’t even handle a winning streak—they get carried away, increase their bets, and eventually blow everything they’ve made.
Whereas with this, the idea is to stay disciplined, manage the risk, and quietly compound the gains rather than throwing everything at the next trade.
And because it’s fully automated, there’s little to no psychology involved—no emotional decisions, no second-guessing, and no temptation to suddenly increase the risk.
·
2
Jason Smith
Markov Matrix Trades this week (No Forex)
Looking good and i have a certain asset performing extremely well over the last 12 weeks.
That will be kept quite.
The draw down allows me to work out the account size if i want the instrument at a base of just 1 mini, then using multipliers to push that down further to reduce exposure
Looking good and i have a certain asset performing extremely well over the last 12 weeks.
That will be kept quite.
The draw down allows me to work out the account size if i want the instrument at a base of just 1 mini, then using multipliers to push that down further to reduce exposure
Jason Smith
2026.09.23
I really think I could do it with just a $500 account, based on what I’ve seen so far. Then I can quietly compound it and build from there.
Jason Smith
2026.09.23
This is the real benefit of forward testing. I’ve got 3 month worth of data (trades) across forex, energy, crypto, metals and indices and 6 month of model learning which gives me a much clearer picture of how the strategy performs across different markets and conditions.
Jason Smith
2026.09.23
A certain instrument has produced over 3 k in profit over the last 100 days with very small weekly DD's
Jason Smith
UFC and Boxing-
I'm not saying all these fights are rigged.
Take Mayweather vs. McGregor.
The whole thing was a show.
Mayweather admitted he "carried" McGregor to make him look good for the fans.
Oscar De La Hoya called it a "million-dollar fraud" and a "staged performance".
Bob Arum said Mayweather could have finished it in the second round if there wasn't so much money on the table
I'm not saying all these fights are rigged.
Take Mayweather vs. McGregor.
The whole thing was a show.
Mayweather admitted he "carried" McGregor to make him look good for the fans.
Oscar De La Hoya called it a "million-dollar fraud" and a "staged performance".
Bob Arum said Mayweather could have finished it in the second round if there wasn't so much money on the table
·
2
Jason Smith
Epstein is probably still alive. —
Epstein's death in a federal jail, under maximum watch, with cameras that failed and guards who were asleep, is genuinely suspicious.
It's reasonable to distrust the official account.
Epstein's death in a federal jail, under maximum watch, with cameras that failed and guards who were asleep, is genuinely suspicious.
It's reasonable to distrust the official account.
Jason Smith
Thought of the day -
The world has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth.
Even the UFC is at it.
I saw two fighters at a weigh-in having a big argument, pushing each other and swinging punches.
Then, right at the end, I saw them exchange sunglasses.
Talk about taking the fans for fools.
And when it comes to Conor McGregor, I’ve always questioned some of his fights.
The way everything played out against José Aldo and then Nate Diaz. Rigged
The world has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth.
Even the UFC is at it.
I saw two fighters at a weigh-in having a big argument, pushing each other and swinging punches.
Then, right at the end, I saw them exchange sunglasses.
Talk about taking the fans for fools.
And when it comes to Conor McGregor, I’ve always questioned some of his fights.
The way everything played out against José Aldo and then Nate Diaz. Rigged
Jason Smith
2026.09.21
The best way to describe the world — layers of deception, hidden agendas and people being led to believe one thing while something else is happening behind the scenes
Jason Smith
2026.09.21
Epstein Class - They own the assets, control the systems and shape the world around you, while the average person is left fighting over scraps.
Jason Smith
2026.09.22
McGregor looked like he was on drugs on stage. He kept looking himself up and down in his Gucci suit, and his behaviour seemed really erratic. The sunglasses exchange was covert—it was all prearranged bullshit. It wasn’t even McGregor’s fight conference, so why was he on stage? It was clearly to help sell tickets. Does the UFC really need to resort to this kind of dishonest bullshit when so many of the fights can speak for themselves?
Jason Smith
#Bitcoin #BTC #Crypto #BullMarket
Jason Smith
2026.09.15
Whenever I mention Bitcoin, I’m referring to holding BTC as a long-term investment, not actively spot trading it
Jason Smith
Streetbeefs on YouTube —
The first fight in the latest videos is a title fight, and the guy is in his 50s.
If you’ve got nothing to do right now, go take a look.
It’s a good fight!
That’s the cool thing about 100% algorithmic trading — you don’t have to stay glued to the charts.
When I was trading price action, I’d sometimes use bots and sometimes trade manually.
Now I’m fully into algo trading.
When things go bad, it’s easy to turn off the monitor, play some Call of Duty or whatever, and take another look later.
The first fight in the latest videos is a title fight, and the guy is in his 50s.
If you’ve got nothing to do right now, go take a look.
It’s a good fight!
That’s the cool thing about 100% algorithmic trading — you don’t have to stay glued to the charts.
When I was trading price action, I’d sometimes use bots and sometimes trade manually.
Now I’m fully into algo trading.
When things go bad, it’s easy to turn off the monitor, play some Call of Duty or whatever, and take another look later.
Jason Smith
Unrealized profit - New Project
This EA trades the aqua-coloured areas you can see.
It’s quite a new system and was actually one I was planning to sell, but there doesn’t seem to be much interest in any of my work, so I don’t really see the point anymore.
It’s set to H12 ATR for both the stop loss and take profit — keeping it simple with a 1:1 risk-to-reward ratio.
I don’t know if it has a real edge yet.
It’s quite new, so time will tell.
I do zero backtesting because I believe it’s a rigged game.
The Strategy Tester is a brilliant idea and a valuable tool for developers, but I don’t put much faith in the backtest results. (ticks)
I only forward test
This EA trades the aqua-coloured areas you can see.
It’s quite a new system and was actually one I was planning to sell, but there doesn’t seem to be much interest in any of my work, so I don’t really see the point anymore.
It’s set to H12 ATR for both the stop loss and take profit — keeping it simple with a 1:1 risk-to-reward ratio.
I don’t know if it has a real edge yet.
It’s quite new, so time will tell.
I do zero backtesting because I believe it’s a rigged game.
The Strategy Tester is a brilliant idea and a valuable tool for developers, but I don’t put much faith in the backtest results. (ticks)
I only forward test
Jason Smith
2026.09.11
Most of you haven’t got a clue when it comes to fake black-box EAs and genuine price-action tools.
Jason Smith
Markov Matrix - unrealized profit for today. (Forex)
It’s been a good day for Markov, with both realized and unrealized profits contributing to a strong overall result.
It’s been a good day for Markov, with both realized and unrealized profits contributing to a strong overall result.
