Specification

the CCI entry is independent from the MA (Moving Average) entry in your described strategy.

There are two distinct entry strategies:

SMA-Based Entry: One strategy uses simple moving averages (SMAs) and their shifts to determine entry points. This is a classic trend-following approach, where entries are triggered based on the relationship between price and the moving averages, such as crossovers or shifts in the SMA lines.

CCI-Based Entry: The other strategy uses two Commodity Channel Index (CCI) indicators on each timeframe. In this setup, a simple moving average (SMA) is applied to the CCI itself, which helps to smooth the CCI signals and potentially filter out noise. The entry is triggered based on the behavior of these CCI indicators, such as crossing certain thresholds (like the zero line or ±100 levels), with confirmation from both CCIs before entering a trade.

These two entry methods operate independently:

The SMA entry does not require confirmation from the CCI.

The CCI entry does not require confirmation from the SMA.

This allows for flexibility in your trading system, where you can choose to enter trades based on either the moving average signals or the CCI signals, depending on which strategy's conditions are met first. In some advanced strategies, traders may combine both for additional confirmation, but in your described setup, each entry method stands alone.

Summary Table

Entry Method Indicators Used Entry Trigger Example Independent?
SMA Entry SMAs and their shifts Price crossing above/below SMA Yes
CCI Entry Two CCIs + SMA on CCI Both CCIs cross threshold (e.g., zero) Yes
This separation lets you test, optimize, or combine the strategies as you see fit, but by default, each is an independent entry system.

Files:

JPG
CV.jpg
25.2 Kb
JPG
DFHGF.jpg
15.1 Kb

Responded

1
Developer 1
Rating
(274)
Projects
403
28%
Arbitration
40
40% / 50%
Overdue
1
0%
Free
2
Developer 2
Rating
(47)
Projects
67
37%
Arbitration
5
40% / 40%
Overdue
1
1%
Free
3
Developer 3
Rating
(8)
Projects
11
0%
Arbitration
8
25% / 63%
Overdue
2
18%
Working
4
Developer 4
Rating
(2)
Projects
2
0%
Arbitration
0
Overdue
0
Free
5
Developer 5
Rating
(29)
Projects
49
22%
Arbitration
14
29% / 21%
Overdue
13
27%
Free
6
Developer 6
Rating
Projects
0
0%
Arbitration
1
0% / 100%
Overdue
0
Free
7
Developer 7
Rating
(16)
Projects
35
23%
Arbitration
4
0% / 50%
Overdue
2
6%
Working
8
Developer 8
Rating
(618)
Projects
1429
59%
Arbitration
31
81% / 0%
Overdue
10
1%
Free
9
Developer 9
Rating
(78)
Projects
246
74%
Arbitration
7
100% / 0%
Overdue
1
0%
Free
Published: 1 article
10
Developer 10
Rating
(574)
Projects
945
47%
Arbitration
309
58% / 27%
Overdue
125
13%
Free
11
Developer 11
Rating
(64)
Projects
144
46%
Arbitration
20
40% / 20%
Overdue
32
22%
Free
Similar orders
Hello, I want a simple bot for NinjaTrader8. I need a bot that operates automatically on Nasdaq (NQ/MNQ). Requirements: open buys and sells following a simple trend strategy, configurable stop loss and take profit, risk per trade of 1 to 2% of capital, if it loses 3% in a day, stop trading until the next day. Compatible with backtesting, delivery of the source code and the working bot in NinjaTrader 8. My initial
{ "strategy_name": "M5 EMA Scalper", "timeframe": "M5", "indicators": { "ema_fast": 20, "ema_slow": 50, "rsi": 14, "atr": 14 }, "entry_rules": { "buy": [ "EMA20 > EMA50", "Price closes above EMA20", "RSI > 55" ], "sell": [ "EMA20 < EMA50", "Price closes below EMA20", "RSI < 45" ] }, "risk_management": { "risk_per_trade": 1.0, "stop_loss_atr": 1.5, "take_profit_rr": 2.0
I have a High-Frequency Trading (HFT) Expert Advisor for both MT4 and MT5 designed primarily for US30 (Dow Jones Index) . The EA performs consistently and profitably on demo accounts, but when I run it on an IC Markets Raw or Standard live account, it starts generating losses under what appear to be the same trading conditions. At this time, I cannot provide the source code (.mq4/.mq5). I can only provide the
I am looking for an experienced MQL5 developer to build a high-frequency (HFT) latency arbitrage Expert Advisor for Pepperstone MT5 , using LMAX as the leading price feed. The initial focus will be on US30 (Dow Jones) , and if the strategy proves successful, I want the EA to be easily expandable to additional symbols such as NAS100, GER40, XAUUSD, major forex pairs, and other supported instruments. The EA should
I am looking for an experienced MQL5 or MQL4 developer with a strong understanding of high-frequency trading (HFT) concepts who can explain how certain HFT-style strategies have historically been able to pass proprietary firm evaluations while also being profitable on demo accounts and capable of transitioning successfully to live trading. I am interested in understanding the legitimate trading logic, execution
Pine Script Integration Request (Experienced Coders Only) I am looking for a highly experienced Pine Script developer to integrate a Demand & Supply Zone module into my existing indicator. Requirements Keep my current indicator (Rudy) exactly as it is. Do NOT modify, remove, or alter any existing logic, calculations, signals, alerts, or visual elements. Add only the Demand & Supply Zone boxes from a second Pine

Project information

Budget
30+ USD
Deadline
from 5 day(s)