Specifiche

the CCI entry is independent from the MA (Moving Average) entry in your described strategy.

There are two distinct entry strategies:

SMA-Based Entry: One strategy uses simple moving averages (SMAs) and their shifts to determine entry points. This is a classic trend-following approach, where entries are triggered based on the relationship between price and the moving averages, such as crossovers or shifts in the SMA lines.

CCI-Based Entry: The other strategy uses two Commodity Channel Index (CCI) indicators on each timeframe. In this setup, a simple moving average (SMA) is applied to the CCI itself, which helps to smooth the CCI signals and potentially filter out noise. The entry is triggered based on the behavior of these CCI indicators, such as crossing certain thresholds (like the zero line or ±100 levels), with confirmation from both CCIs before entering a trade.

These two entry methods operate independently:

The SMA entry does not require confirmation from the CCI.

The CCI entry does not require confirmation from the SMA.

This allows for flexibility in your trading system, where you can choose to enter trades based on either the moving average signals or the CCI signals, depending on which strategy's conditions are met first. In some advanced strategies, traders may combine both for additional confirmation, but in your described setup, each entry method stands alone.

Summary Table

Entry Method Indicators Used Entry Trigger Example Independent?
SMA Entry SMAs and their shifts Price crossing above/below SMA Yes
CCI Entry Two CCIs + SMA on CCI Both CCIs cross threshold (e.g., zero) Yes
This separation lets you test, optimize, or combine the strategies as you see fit, but by default, each is an independent entry system.

File:

JPG
CV.jpg
25.2 Kb
JPG
DFHGF.jpg
15.1 Kb

Con risposta

1
Sviluppatore 1
Valutazioni
(274)
Progetti
403
28%
Arbitraggio
40
40% / 50%
In ritardo
1
0%
Gratuito
2
Sviluppatore 2
Valutazioni
(47)
Progetti
67
37%
Arbitraggio
5
40% / 40%
In ritardo
1
1%
Gratuito
3
Sviluppatore 3
Valutazioni
(8)
Progetti
11
0%
Arbitraggio
8
25% / 63%
In ritardo
2
18%
In elaborazione
4
Sviluppatore 4
Valutazioni
(2)
Progetti
2
0%
Arbitraggio
0
In ritardo
0
Gratuito
5
Sviluppatore 5
Valutazioni
(29)
Progetti
49
22%
Arbitraggio
14
29% / 21%
In ritardo
13
27%
Gratuito
6
Sviluppatore 6
Valutazioni
Progetti
0
0%
Arbitraggio
1
0% / 100%
In ritardo
0
Gratuito
7
Sviluppatore 7
Valutazioni
(16)
Progetti
35
23%
Arbitraggio
4
0% / 50%
In ritardo
2
6%
In elaborazione
8
Sviluppatore 8
Valutazioni
(618)
Progetti
1429
59%
Arbitraggio
31
81% / 0%
In ritardo
10
1%
Gratuito
9
Sviluppatore 9
Valutazioni
(78)
Progetti
246
74%
Arbitraggio
7
100% / 0%
In ritardo
1
0%
Gratuito
Pubblicati: 1 articolo
10
Sviluppatore 10
Valutazioni
(574)
Progetti
945
47%
Arbitraggio
309
58% / 27%
In ritardo
125
13%
Gratuito
11
Sviluppatore 11
Valutazioni
(64)
Progetti
144
46%
Arbitraggio
20
40% / 20%
In ritardo
32
22%
Gratuito
Ordini simili
Hello, I want a simple bot for NinjaTrader8. I need a bot that operates automatically on Nasdaq (NQ/MNQ). Requirements: open buys and sells following a simple trend strategy, configurable stop loss and take profit, risk per trade of 1 to 2% of capital, if it loses 3% in a day, stop trading until the next day. Compatible with backtesting, delivery of the source code and the working bot in NinjaTrader 8. My initial
{ "strategy_name": "M5 EMA Scalper", "timeframe": "M5", "indicators": { "ema_fast": 20, "ema_slow": 50, "rsi": 14, "atr": 14 }, "entry_rules": { "buy": [ "EMA20 > EMA50", "Price closes above EMA20", "RSI > 55" ], "sell": [ "EMA20 < EMA50", "Price closes below EMA20", "RSI < 45" ] }, "risk_management": { "risk_per_trade": 1.0, "stop_loss_atr": 1.5, "take_profit_rr": 2.0
I have a High-Frequency Trading (HFT) Expert Advisor for both MT4 and MT5 designed primarily for US30 (Dow Jones Index) . The EA performs consistently and profitably on demo accounts, but when I run it on an IC Markets Raw or Standard live account, it starts generating losses under what appear to be the same trading conditions. At this time, I cannot provide the source code (.mq4/.mq5). I can only provide the
I am looking for an experienced MQL5 developer to build a high-frequency (HFT) latency arbitrage Expert Advisor for Pepperstone MT5 , using LMAX as the leading price feed. The initial focus will be on US30 (Dow Jones) , and if the strategy proves successful, I want the EA to be easily expandable to additional symbols such as NAS100, GER40, XAUUSD, major forex pairs, and other supported instruments. The EA should
I am looking for an experienced MQL5 or MQL4 developer with a strong understanding of high-frequency trading (HFT) concepts who can explain how certain HFT-style strategies have historically been able to pass proprietary firm evaluations while also being profitable on demo accounts and capable of transitioning successfully to live trading. I am interested in understanding the legitimate trading logic, execution
Pine Script Integration Request (Experienced Coders Only) I am looking for a highly experienced Pine Script developer to integrate a Demand & Supply Zone module into my existing indicator. Requirements Keep my current indicator (Rudy) exactly as it is. Do NOT modify, remove, or alter any existing logic, calculations, signals, alerts, or visual elements. Add only the Demand & Supply Zone boxes from a second Pine

Informazioni sul progetto

Budget
30+ USD
Scadenze
da 5 giorno(i)