Termos de Referência

the CCI entry is independent from the MA (Moving Average) entry in your described strategy.

There are two distinct entry strategies:

SMA-Based Entry: One strategy uses simple moving averages (SMAs) and their shifts to determine entry points. This is a classic trend-following approach, where entries are triggered based on the relationship between price and the moving averages, such as crossovers or shifts in the SMA lines.

CCI-Based Entry: The other strategy uses two Commodity Channel Index (CCI) indicators on each timeframe. In this setup, a simple moving average (SMA) is applied to the CCI itself, which helps to smooth the CCI signals and potentially filter out noise. The entry is triggered based on the behavior of these CCI indicators, such as crossing certain thresholds (like the zero line or ±100 levels), with confirmation from both CCIs before entering a trade.

These two entry methods operate independently:

The SMA entry does not require confirmation from the CCI.

The CCI entry does not require confirmation from the SMA.

This allows for flexibility in your trading system, where you can choose to enter trades based on either the moving average signals or the CCI signals, depending on which strategy's conditions are met first. In some advanced strategies, traders may combine both for additional confirmation, but in your described setup, each entry method stands alone.

Summary Table

Entry Method Indicators Used Entry Trigger Example Independent?
SMA Entry SMAs and their shifts Price crossing above/below SMA Yes
CCI Entry Two CCIs + SMA on CCI Both CCIs cross threshold (e.g., zero) Yes
This separation lets you test, optimize, or combine the strategies as you see fit, but by default, each is an independent entry system.

Arquivos anexados:

JPG
CV.jpg
25.2 Kb
JPG
DFHGF.jpg
15.1 Kb

Respondido

1
Desenvolvedor 1
Classificação
(274)
Projetos
403
28%
Arbitragem
40
40% / 50%
Expirado
1
0%
Livre
2
Desenvolvedor 2
Classificação
(47)
Projetos
67
37%
Arbitragem
5
40% / 40%
Expirado
1
1%
Livre
3
Desenvolvedor 3
Classificação
(8)
Projetos
11
0%
Arbitragem
8
25% / 63%
Expirado
2
18%
Trabalhando
4
Desenvolvedor 4
Classificação
(2)
Projetos
2
0%
Arbitragem
0
Expirado
0
Livre
5
Desenvolvedor 5
Classificação
(29)
Projetos
49
22%
Arbitragem
14
29% / 21%
Expirado
13
27%
Livre
6
Desenvolvedor 6
Classificação
Projetos
0
0%
Arbitragem
1
0% / 100%
Expirado
0
Livre
7
Desenvolvedor 7
Classificação
(16)
Projetos
35
23%
Arbitragem
4
0% / 50%
Expirado
2
6%
Trabalhando
8
Desenvolvedor 8
Classificação
(618)
Projetos
1429
59%
Arbitragem
31
81% / 0%
Expirado
10
1%
Livre
9
Desenvolvedor 9
Classificação
(78)
Projetos
246
74%
Arbitragem
7
100% / 0%
Expirado
1
0%
Livre
Publicou: 1 artigo
10
Desenvolvedor 10
Classificação
(574)
Projetos
945
47%
Arbitragem
309
58% / 27%
Expirado
125
13%
Livre
11
Desenvolvedor 11
Classificação
(64)
Projetos
144
46%
Arbitragem
20
40% / 20%
Expirado
32
22%
Livre
Pedidos semelhantes
Hello, I want a simple bot for NinjaTrader8. I need a bot that operates automatically on Nasdaq (NQ/MNQ). Requirements: open buys and sells following a simple trend strategy, configurable stop loss and take profit, risk per trade of 1 to 2% of capital, if it loses 3% in a day, stop trading until the next day. Compatible with backtesting, delivery of the source code and the working bot in NinjaTrader 8. My initial
{ "strategy_name": "M5 EMA Scalper", "timeframe": "M5", "indicators": { "ema_fast": 20, "ema_slow": 50, "rsi": 14, "atr": 14 }, "entry_rules": { "buy": [ "EMA20 > EMA50", "Price closes above EMA20", "RSI > 55" ], "sell": [ "EMA20 < EMA50", "Price closes below EMA20", "RSI < 45" ] }, "risk_management": { "risk_per_trade": 1.0, "stop_loss_atr": 1.5, "take_profit_rr": 2.0
I have a High-Frequency Trading (HFT) Expert Advisor for both MT4 and MT5 designed primarily for US30 (Dow Jones Index) . The EA performs consistently and profitably on demo accounts, but when I run it on an IC Markets Raw or Standard live account, it starts generating losses under what appear to be the same trading conditions. At this time, I cannot provide the source code (.mq4/.mq5). I can only provide the
I am looking for an experienced MQL5 developer to build a high-frequency (HFT) latency arbitrage Expert Advisor for Pepperstone MT5 , using LMAX as the leading price feed. The initial focus will be on US30 (Dow Jones) , and if the strategy proves successful, I want the EA to be easily expandable to additional symbols such as NAS100, GER40, XAUUSD, major forex pairs, and other supported instruments. The EA should
I am looking for an experienced MQL5 or MQL4 developer with a strong understanding of high-frequency trading (HFT) concepts who can explain how certain HFT-style strategies have historically been able to pass proprietary firm evaluations while also being profitable on demo accounts and capable of transitioning successfully to live trading. I am interested in understanding the legitimate trading logic, execution
Pine Script Integration Request (Experienced Coders Only) I am looking for a highly experienced Pine Script developer to integrate a Demand & Supply Zone module into my existing indicator. Requirements Keep my current indicator (Rudy) exactly as it is. Do NOT modify, remove, or alter any existing logic, calculations, signals, alerts, or visual elements. Add only the Demand & Supply Zone boxes from a second Pine

Informações sobre o projeto

Orçamento
30+ USD
Prazo
de 5 dias