Discussion of article "How to Post a Product in the Market" - page 21
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Pessimist?
Where do you see what you claim?
I'm a salesman. Your panic is for nothing.
You didn't look hard enough:
2. The inspection time of a Product depends on its complexity. For complex Products the inspection time may be increased unilaterally.
I have this problem: comments left in Discussions on published products (both mine and others'), including my own product, do not become available immediately, but only after a long time, usually the next day. Is this the case with everyone, or is it just me? When I addressed this issue to the moderator in private messages last week, he was very surprised, asked to send screenshots, etc., in short, it was news to him. Then he started to clarify the situation with tech support, and in the end he said that it must be a bug and they are looking into the situation. So far nothing has changed. It's strange. Does anyone else have this problem?
Please contact servicedesk. Specify your browser and a link to the product where this happens.
Okay. So I'm the only one with this problem?
Is it possible to know when it is planned to introduce a temporary licence(LICENSE_TIME) for Market products? MQL has this type for a long time, but nobody is in a hurry to introduce it.
I think it would radically change the Market for the better. I think it is clear to everyone that the seller of a quality product is interested in its long-term lease, not as it is now - sold and forgotten. What is there to say, you sell your MT under a temporary licence.
And this will be a big plus for the buyer. First of all, the seller is always interested in the buyer, and secondly, and most importantly, he doesn't have to invest a lot of money at once. Buy a monthly licence - watch it - don't like it - cancel further subscription. This would instantly clear the Market of all kinds of slag.
Because now there's a lot of crap going on. The Market is overflowing with pseudo-grails, crowds of scammers warm their hands on the naivety and ignorance of buyers, selling them all sorts of crap at fabulous prices, which works either only in the tester or only with a certain broker, giving non-market quotes (non-market quotes).non-market quotes (accordingly, these trades will then be recognised as non-market and cancelled) - I did not make all this up, anyone can look in the top, go to the discussion and read the comments to any such miracle-grail, almost everywhere the scenario is similar:The client asks why my Expert Advisor is losing, and the author asks him to go to a private message, where he will tell him the name of the "right" broker.Well, the topic of kickbacks for deleting negative posts has also been raised (and facts have been cited).
Now there is a lot of talk about how to protect the interests of buyers, for example, to oblige sellers to pre-monitor the EA in Signals, or some other restrictions - but all this is ineffective, it will only slow down the process of entry for decent sellers, and the scammers will still get in, there are plenty of ways.
Therefore, the only way, in my opinion, to save buyers' money is a temporary licence. It will not protect from fraudsters, but at least it will minimise losses. In the end, the scammers themselves will leave, because it will become unprofitable. After all, for a monthly licence you can no longer ask for 2 thousand zeleny, right? Put 200 quid - several people will buy at once - and quickly come to light, because a lot of people will not shut their mouths.
You consider checking only an undesirable waste of time, and it can be even worse, when changes based on comments also have a questionable effect on the quality of the product.
For example, in my Expert Advisor, which loads a lot of neural indicators embedded in resources, as well as external indicators trained on different patterns, instruments and timeframes, I have now made two changes based on comments. The first one is to remove the error message when trying to call a non-existent external indicator, and the second one is to do the same for indicators from EA resources. But since MQL has no standard means of navigating through indicators and resources, and the use of APIs and DLLs is prohibited in the rules, in the process of these two edits I had to make, in my opinion, a two-way deterioration in the quality of the Expert Advisor:
1. I removed the priority for loading external indicators from the terminal catalogue, thus depriving the user of the possibility to supplement the indicator library and update it by overlapping old versions of indicators compiled in the EA resources.
2. I duplicated the list of indicator names built into the resources with a control array, thus complicating the programmer's ability to add new indicators to the EA and increasing the probability of errors.
At the moment I am waiting for new comments, it's the second week - the test continues.
For MT4 Expert Advisors there is a concept of "demo" (now trial), for indicators there is not, and what can be said about libraries?