AI 2023. Meet ChatGPT. - page 13
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
AI is logic. The more diverse information is analysed, the more accurate the output will be.
Modern computer technology makes it possible to do this quickly.
Yes, there is already an academic sitting in every AI answer, and even, I think, more than one.
AI is logic. The more diverse information is analysed, the more accurate the output will be.
Modern computer technology makes it possible to do this quickly.
Yes, there is already an academic sitting in every AI answer, and even, I think, more than one.
You are narrow-minded and do not understand one simple thing. Now the AI is an assistant, and tomorrow it is your master. Nowadays, almost everyone carries micro bombs in his hand or pocket, which can detonate your gadget on command. And you keep reassuring yourself - it's no big deal, what can AI do to us? You'll see what it can do. I hope that, due to my age, I will not live to see this apocalypse.
Regards, Vladimir.
You are narrow-minded and do not understand one simple thing. Now the AI is an assistant, and tomorrow it will be your master. At the moment, almost everyone is carrying micro-bombs in their hand or pocket that can detonate your gadget on command. And you keep reassuring yourself - it's no big deal, what can AI do to us? You'll see what it can do. I hope that, because of my age, I won't live to see this apocalypse.
Regards, Vladimir.
The range of my thoughts is by no means narrow)))))
Regarding AI.
Few people notice that every inhabitant (user) of the Internet has a personal file and every seemingly harmless fart is monitored.
With the help of AI the inclinations to terrorist, sabotage and other activities are tracked.
On the one hand this is good for preventing sabotage and preventing accidents and other stuff.
But at the same time it can affect a lot of people with invasion of their privacy. That's the way it is. Not everyone is conscientious, not at all.
There are many more uses for AI that I don't even want to mention for ethical reasons.
AI Test Plan
1. Objective:
To compare the "intelligence" of ChatGPT with that of humans to determine competitiveness in the market for intellectual and creative labour.
The chance of commercial survival of ChatGPT exists if it displaces humans from their jobs and takes over their functions. Let us compare the competing parties on the parameters: learnability, competence, efficiency, reliability and price. The losing side will give up its positions in the professional sphere. In the case of AI losing, the project funding will be cut before a break in the trend (emergence of new AI technology), in the case of people... a break in the trend of losing to AI is unlikely to happen.
2. Method:
The profession and employer's requirements for an employee are the criteria for evaluating their test results in the hiring process. Tests for AI should identify qualities that satisfy the profession and employer's requirements of a person.
To do this:
Tests should be drawn up to identify knowledge, qualities and skills for admission to specialised and demanded jobs.
*Taking into account our ignorance of the degree of AI capabilities, the tests should have a gradation of difficulty from child to professional, to fix the exact level.
3- Testing:
Under each evaluation criterion (driven by the requirement of the profession and employer), several tests of varying degrees of difficulty will be created to capture the exact level of AI abilities.
Then, a comparative analysis will be made with the average human performance on similar tests and conclusions will be drawn about the competitiveness of the AI in each occupational niche.
In conclusion, we will get the most accurate view available today of the possible scale of AI adoption in professional fields. Its competence in scientific fields and the displacement of humans from them. I emphasise that the conclusions will become outdated as the technology improves, but we can use our testing again when the data becomes obsolete.
Interestingly, the qualities that have been suggested to be tested by AI are implicit in humans by default. These are:
The only people worth testing for these qualities are young children. In an adult, in most cases, they are present initially.
Therefore, I propose to create a set of initial tests to check these qualities and basic abilities (logic, arithmetic, physics...) and then move on to the main tests.
I would like to note that Logic, Arithmetic and Physics should be tested not on book knowledge, but on actual knowledge. On the ability to use them to solve problems, not to quote textbooks.
Interestingly, the qualities that have been suggested to be tested by AI are implicit in humans by default. Here they are:
The only people worth testing for these qualities are young children. In most cases, they are present from the beginning in an adult.
Therefore, I propose to create a set of initial tests to check these qualities and basic abilities (logic, arithmetic, physics...) and then move on to the main tests.
I would like to note that Logic, Arithmetic and Physics should be tested not on book knowledge, but on actual knowledge. On the ability to use them to solve problems, not to quote textbooks.
Interestingly, the qualities that have been suggested to be tested by AI are implicit in humans by default. Here they are:
The only people worth testing for these qualities are young children. In most cases, they are present from the beginning in an adult.
Therefore, I propose to create a set of initial tests to check these qualities and basic abilities (logic, arithmetic, physics...) and then move on to the main tests.
I would like to note that Logic, Arithmetic and Physics should be tested not on book knowledge, but on actual knowledge. On the ability to use them to solve problems, not to quote textbooks.
Release Notes (30 January)
We have updated the ChatGPT model with improved factuality and maths capabilities.
Release Notes (9 January)
We're excited to announce several updates to ChatGPT! Here's what's new:
We've made more improvements to the ChatGPT model! It should be better overall across a wide range of topics and has improved factuality.
Stop Generating: Based on your feedback, we've added the ability to stop generating a ChatGPT response
Release Notes (15 December)
We're excited to announce several updates to ChatGPT! Here's what's new:
Overall performance: Among other improvements, users will notice that ChatGPT is now less likely to refuse to answer questions.
Conversation History: you will soon be able to view past conversations with ChatGPT, rename saved conversations, and delete those you don't want to keep. We are gradually rolling out this feature.
Daily Limit: In order to provide a high quality of service to all ChatGPT users, we are experimenting with a daily message limit. If you are included in this group, you will be given the opportunity to expand your access by providing feedback to ChatGPT.
To find out if you are using the updated version, search for "ChatGPT Dec 15 Version" at the bottom of the screen.
Retag , I was wondering. Do you want to find flaws in the software, or improve it?
Good question... To be honest, I'd like to improve it. But not their programme, but my technology, which has been in development for a long time. Not as long as their technology, which has been developed and refined over decades. My system is just over three years old and it needs to grow and grow, but it is very reasonable to take an example from "adults", so I am trying to understand ChatGPT.
When conducting tests, it should be noted that AI is being improved regularly and currently with great intensity. Today's tests may not be true in a month's time, so it should be realised that only the capabilities of this moment will be tested.
Release Notes (30 January)
We have updated the ChatGPT model with improved factuality and maths capabilities.
Release Notes (9 January)
We're excited to announce several updates to ChatGPT! Here's what's new:
We've made more improvements to the ChatGPT model! It should be better overall across a wide range of topics and has improved factuality.
Stop Generating: Based on your feedback, we've added the ability to stop generating a ChatGPT response
Release Notes (15 December)
We're excited to announce several updates to ChatGPT! Here's what's new:
Overall performance: Among other improvements, users will notice that ChatGPT is now less likely to refuse to answer questions.
Conversation History: you will soon be able to view past conversations with ChatGPT, rename saved conversations, and delete those you don't want to keep. We are gradually rolling out this feature.
Daily Limit: In order to provide a high quality of service to all ChatGPT users, we are experimenting with a daily message limit. If you are included in this group, you will be given the opportunity to expand your access by providing feedback to ChatGPT.
To find out if you are using the updated version, search for "ChatGPT Dec 15 Version" at the bottom of the screen.
As long as ChatGPT is being improved and trained by humans, the update process will be relatively slow. That's when it can self-learn and self-improve..... we'll have to test it non-stop. Hopefully that won't be anytime soon. )
Good question... Frankly, I'd like to improve. But not their programme, but my technology, which has been in development for a long time. Not as long as their technology, which has been developed and improved for decades. My system is just over three years old and it needs to grow and grow, but it is very wise to take an example from "adults", so I am trying to figure out ChatGPT.
Thanks for the reply. Now it makes sense.