A topic for traders. - page 207
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It's easy to see that Mr Isersky is a hypocrite and a liar, from the history of the posts, for example:
And after that such a shame... and talks about "instability"...
Nah nah. I don't need to be convinced of anything to change my opinion of another person.
The person (trader) just raised the topic of waves and developed it.
I may raise one topic (a "sideways channel" for example) and develop it to the end.
and say that it works. But it doesn't. No, of course it works, but only
in the ratio of many parameters.
Where is this channel (up or down), where is the price
looking at the 4h or daily chart, whether there was an impulse movement in the non-shallow TF
and its subsequent breaking by a stronger impulse and many other similar things
to be guided by when trading. And the one you are so politely discussing,
just picked up one topic and developed it. And he is not guided only by waves.
And you are trying so hard to throw flowers at him. That's no way to do it.
And you're trying so hard to throw flowers at him. You can't do that.
He is getting flowered because he is running around on ALL forum threads saying that he knows the great secret of the market and its every move. Although, before the loss on the signal, everyone could see that he was just a pipsqueak...
It is a mystery. The SMA is a good approximation. But, it's not even about the average, it's about the sample size for it.
Since you obviously don't know how to identify the right sample, you're looking at several TFs at once. Why? That's probably not bad either. However, some Scrigan using such a method quickly emptied all investors' money. But, admittedly, he found it, which is not easy. And he continues to pursue his line, now using a non-linear time scale (see smartlab). I have faith.
Sasha, I' ve been reading smartlab for a very long time.
What is the sample? The price is the same in all samples at a particular time.
SMA changes when the observation period changes.
How do we recognise the mystery?
You, unlike some, I consider adequate.
We can discuss this quite seriously.
===========
I do not and will not read the avatar with the cultivator)). Hee-hee.
Willpower and character developed in the markets.))
He gets flowered because he runs on ALL the forum threads and tells us that he knows the great secret of the market and its every move. Although, before the loss on the signal, everyone could see that he was just a pipsqueak...
Maybe you're young and you do not understand who the elite is in the markets?
The elite in the markets are the right pipsaries.
Please write it on your forehead))
==========
Here's a tip.
In the market, all TFs are equal in terms of rules and laws.
The sillier the speculator, the more expensive the TF he trades on.
Investors come first on higher TFs ))))
Perhaps you are still young and have not understood who the elite are in the markets?
The elite in the markets are the right pipsqueaks.
Please write it on your forehead))
==========
Here's a tip.
In the market, all TFs are equal in terms of rules and laws.
The sillier the speculator, the more expensive the TF he trades on.
Investors come first on the higher TF )))
You've lost and closed your only signal. You have $25 in your trading account.
What "elite"?
You've drained and closed your only signal. You have $25 in your trading account.
What "elite"?
Why do you keep saying, "lost,lost.........."?
You didn't?
Everyone here has lost at least once.
So what?
Sasha, I' ve been reading smartlab for a very long time.
Which sample? The price is the same in all samples at a certain time.
The SMA changes as the observation period changes.
How do we recognise the mystery?
You, unlike some, I consider adequate.
We can have a serious discussion.
I have given examples.
A.G. works with the dynamic window on the channel breakout. He has a profit every year for 20 years.
I work with a dynamic window to return to the average. In the past year I've made $24 from $160. It's nothing, of course. But, it's the principle that matters to me.
N. Skrigan worked on several TFs and earned nothing, and, moreover, pissed away investors' money. This is a widely known story and in the past he would certainly have been undercut like Alyosha...
But he has a very strong theory, somewhat similar to yours, investors believe in him and wait for a miracle. Money is not the only thing that keeps a man alive - he believes in miracles just as much as he believes in cash...
Why do you keep saying "leaked, leaked.........."?
You didn't leak?
Everyone here has leaked at least once.
So what?
Yeah, but it's not like I'm running around talking about learning the great secret of the market and the elite.
Yes, but it's not like I'm running around the branches talking about learning the great secret of the market and the elite
And who's stopping you from opening a signal and shouting you're a guru.
Advertising is the engine of progress.
And who's stopping you from opening a signal and shouting that you're a guru.
Advertising is the engine of progress.
I guess I'm just not gonna yell.
I'm not an Izersky.