Negative feedback, statement to regulators and Roskomnadzor. - page 4
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The trivial creation of clones in order to give good reviews to a product bought from oneself.
It's trivial to create clones to give good reviews to a product you've bought yourself.
At least read what I wrote here. I've already told everyone everything in detail. This is some kind of mistake. What clone I created? Who, when? What product did I create?
The creation of clones in order to give good reviews to a product you bought from yourself.
Do you consider the possibility of two different people sitting on one router as clones? For example, his neighbour is a programmer and he gives him a "neighborly" puts 5 *. Is it a violation?
Or have you seen that the card on which the account was funded and the card to which the money went is the same?
Let's try to get@Renat Fatkhullin to clarify the situation.
He is nowhere to be seen since last year. Isthere no one else who can make sense of it?
Do you consider the possibility of two different people sitting on the same router as clones? For example, his neighbour is a programmer, and he and he "neighborly" gives him a 5 *. Is it a violation?
Or are the cards credited and debited at the same time?
Do you consider the possibility of two different people sitting on the same router as clones? For example, his neighbour is a programmer, and he and he "neighborly" gives him a 5 *. Is it a violation?
Or are the cards credited and debited at the same time?
What is the reason for this ban?
Is there any way to warn me before the ban?
I have the same problem Ban until 2031.05.28 (Freelance rules violation)
Not a mistake and you know it. Deliberately and for many years already took away customers to fulfill orders bypassing Freelance.
And were silent even after the ban, did not ask questions in Service Desk. Because the profile remained, shone like a billboard. Now it is all over.
Speaking of bans and such...
it would be nice to see "banned until Thursday-post-rain by moderator XXX with the comment 'zzz' for violating rule 100.500" in the profiles
Exemplary and provable. As a safeguard, the point of reprisals is not to punish, but to prevent repetition...
Not a mistake and you know it. For many years they have deliberately diverted customers to fulfill orders bypassing Freelance.
And you kept quiet even after being banned, you didn't ask questions to Service Desk. Because the profile remained, shining like a billboard. Now it is all over.