Experiment - page 60
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
There's no secret here either. Every reversal starts with a tick). Could I be wrong? Everyone has ticks on the real. One of them is reversal like a boson).
Not at all, rather the opposite )
The irony is that this element is exactly what is needed for New Rehn's theories.
To know when and where it starts).
There's no secret here either. Every reversal starts with a tick). Could I be wrong? Everyone has ticks on the real. One of them is reversal, like a boson.) But it's rare))
Let's reason logically, which came first since the first tick? The reversal or the movement? Of course the movement. The reversal is only the consequence.
So it will always be the movement that comes first, and then the reversal.
But, does this information tell us anything?
No. Because this information is a posteriori.
What do we know about the market?
Practically nothing, except that the chart always moves to the right.)
How can we know anything else?
Only by frequency analysis, in simple terms, what recurs more often is a potential clue.
In fact, the trader must do this analysis on any chart and initially understand what he sees at any given moment and draw conclusions from this to what he can most likely make profit on.Let's think logically, which came first from the moment the first tick came in? The reversal or the movement? Of course the movement. The reversal is only the consequence.
So it will always be the movement that comes first, and then the reversal.
But, does this information tell us anything?
No. Because this information is a posteriori.
What do we know about the market?
Practically nothing, except that the chart always moves to the right.)
How can we know anything else?
Only by frequency analysis, in simple terms, what is repeated more often is a potential clue.
In fact, the trader must do this analysis on any chart and initially understand what he sees at any given moment and draw conclusions from this to what he can most likely make profit on.This is exactly what I wanted to point out here. )
The clue lies in the inconspicuous movement, almost no one notices
everyone sees waves and different chaotic market fluctuations
From a distance it looks like a galaxy, a dense fog and nothing is clear.
But this movement is the backbone of everything, what the market is holding on to.
the main backbone of the mechatronics of the whole market
without the movement, the market would crash like bitcoin at some point in the future.)
Let's think logically, which came first from the moment the first tick came in? The reversal or the movement? Of course the movement. The reversal is only the consequence.
So it will always be the movement that comes first, and then the reversal.
But, does this information tell us anything?
No. Because this information is a posteriori.
What do we know about the market?
Practically nothing, except that the chart always moves to the right.)
How can we know anything else?
Only by frequency analysis, in simple terms, what is repeated more often is a potential clue.
In fact, the trader must do this analysis on any chart and initially understand what he sees at any given moment in time and draw conclusions from this to what he can most likely earn on.That's it for Renat, we won't see the article, Yusuf is left without any co-authorship
he posts one picture and boasts for 20 pages about how he once made a 700% robot and uses the Grail for a vase with daisies :-)
That's it for Renat, we won't see the article, Yusuf is left without any co-authorship
He posts one picture and boasts for 20 pages about how he once made a 700% robot and uses the Grail for a vase with daisies :-)
In the meantime, "news from the field"
Since I'm saddled with all sorts of statistics
On EURUSD the "hypothesis of round and flat levels" is confirmed. Indeed prices are reacting at round levels.
On others too, only the step of the levels is suddenly not round at all and apparently they need to be corrected from time to time (as EURUSD changes they "float")
Gentlemen, the discussion on the results of the experiment has come to a complete standstill because of Rena's unconstructive suggestions. There is a discussion of the well-known TA and FA provisions, which have not helped anyone to overcome Forex. I suggest we move the discussion of Rena's new proposals to a separate thread.
So Rena fills the empty space
A void filling a void (and also filled with a void). A very profound philosophy emerges.