What, again? - page 9

New comment
 

Accessed the product page from my mobile phone.

I can't find any social media sharing buttons.

Are they hiding somewhere or did they never exist?

 
Vladislav Andruschenko:

Marketing - what have we done to get our products to the top?

  1. We have created websites, advertised, posted on blogs and forums - the result is the popularity of our programmes.
  2. We purchased additional tools to implement the programs (video, audio programs, translators........... means technical support.........).
  3. A lot of money was invested in both software and hardware.....

There was a lot of effort to do all this! Very much effort. Those who are engaged in promotion of their programme will understand me.


The result: The program hit the top! Choice of users, feedback from users.

Not everyone did it. Many put the product thinking that it would take off at the top! And users will love it!

But no. You have to spend a lot of effort and time and money to please the user. This is the work on your product.

A product is a complete result. The product is not just a picture from a tester and a program written in one megabyte of code.

You must take into account that the product is a complex!




Look at other companies and their products. Only a product which is comprehensively finished sells.

Everything else is YYYYY - not for sale.

And yes, user choice - herd instinct is also a work in progress/.

IMHO,

Rotation in the marketplace is necessary! But it has to be built properly! Based on the integrated work of the programmer and the seller.

After all, there are programmers in marketing, and there are salespeople.

And there is the integrated work, where there is a programmer (full stack), a designer, a marketer, technical support, .............


And don't forget that there are many kinds of programs in the marketplace!!!! Not just the ones that "automatically mow dough"

You sing beautifully.
Except I've seen your product. In the source code. Copied + does not work as requested. Three iCustoms couldn't combine into one simple program.
So everything is clear with such a TOP.
 
Artyom Trishkin:
That's why everything is clear with such a TOP.

At least he's not promoting his poorly written code as articles.

and jealousy is a bad feeling.
 
Andrei Trukhanovich:

At least he's not promoting his poorly written code as articles.

And jealousy's a bad feeling.

He's a moderator. He's allowed to do anything.
 

Friends, I didn't quite get the emphasis on randomness right, that's not the main thing here. The main thing here is good detailed filters. Because the way it was, even though it was ranked, is total chaos. A huge mass of unsystematic motley pictures is in front of a buyer, and behind every picture you don't know what product is hiding. In order to understand, you have to open and read, to absorb. How much can you look through to try and find the product you are interested in? Not enough - you get tired quickly. This is why no one goes further than the second page.

And filters will allow each potential buyer to leave a dozen programs, and they will all be on his request. Here, among ten, he will choose the best product for him. Everyone wins - those who make their product of higher quality, as well as the buyer and the aggregator. Because order instead of chaos. And when you open a market, there should be random. Well, you can save your filter until the next opening, if someone likes it that way.

 
Andrei Trukhanovich:

At least he's not promoting his poorly written code as articles.

And in general, envy is a bad feeling

His articles are quite a lot of work. But on the fun of it, none of the marketplaces showed any profit in the test, even for a couple of years. Of course the beginning of the test was different.

The real top is not the result of the product, but the result of promotion.

 
Aleksei Stepanenko:

Friends, I didn't quite get the emphasis on randomness right, that's not the main thing here. The main thing here is good detailed filters. Because the way it was, even though it was ranked, it's total chaos. In front of the buyer is a huge mass of patchy pictures, and behind each of them you don't know what product is hiding. In order to understand, you have to open and read, to absorb. How much can you look through to try and find the product you are interested in? Not enough - you get tired quickly. This is why no one goes further than the second page.

And filters will allow each potential buyer to leave a dozen programs, and they will all be on his request. Here, among ten, he will choose the best product for him. Everyone wins - those who make their product of higher quality, as well as the buyer and the aggregator. Because order instead of chaos. And when you open a market, there should be random. Well you can save your filter until the next opening, if someone likes it.

Ranking filters a dozen plus random and search filters by topic, and maybe without ranking. And the first display is random among the filters.

 

Valery, I think the rating is redundant here. Reviews are necessary, a lot of people look at reviews before buying. But, you can also think about how to do them. As an example, the possibility to put a review not earlier than a week later, and a notification comes from the marketplace asking to leave a review. It should be in the form of answers to the market's questions: what did you like, what didn't like, what were the shortcomings, what would you like to change. Then the feedback will be more informative.

And for filters, only technical parameters, without ratings and emotions. For example, there are several options for Expert Advisors:


Type of signal to open trades:

-Zigzag-like indicators,

-use of extrema,

-use of levels,

-Fibonacci,

-Average prices,

-..........


Use of stop:

-Slider setting the limit from and to.


Use of takeaway

-slider also


Use of averaging:

-how many averaging trades,

- direction,

-...


Breakeven, trailing stop, and much, much....

 
Valeriy Yastremskiy:

His articles are quite a lot of work.

does it change the quality of the code in any way?

 
Andrei Trukhanovich:

Does it change the quality of the code in any way?

It's personal, but I'm not disgusted by his code, which is enough to consider it good for me. no more.

12345678910
New comment