From theory to practice - page 977
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Mate (sorry, I'm in the habit of using the word "you").
The thoughts about my life's journey are wrong. But, that's not the point...
My mutual dislike with Asaulenko shouldn't concern anyone - it's a long history.
I only enjoy communicating with people who adhere to my concept - all secrets are on the table! No more and no less. You don't have to be thorough, but references to research/literature + sample deals + stats should be a must.
If you take the same point of view - I'm all ears, if not - we'll all fall into a scolding.
As they say in one ceremony. Good riddance!
My mutual dislike of Asaulenko should not concern anyone - it's a long history.
I only enjoy communicating with people who adhere to my concept - all secrets on the table! No more and no less. You don't have to be thorough, but references to research/literature + sample deals + stats should be a must.
If you take the same point of view - I'm all ears, if not - we'll all fall into a scolding.
What makes you think your dislike is mutual? )) I would be sincerely happy if you succeed, and I don't need your secrets).
But your concept is very interesting - all secrets are on the table. You do not have anything that is at least a bit of a mystery.) What are you going to share? Again, here's your concept and the concept of the topic:
If no one is interested in communicating here, create your own threads and communicate there.
And this one, then, I'll continue alone. And it will only end then, When there will be a stable +100% per month. When? I don't know! But I have faith.
Professor! Temper your ardour, 10 standard lots is the ceiling for the current level of n.e.c. theoretical extravagance in this thread.
Yuri, once again - don't give me a hard time. I have done a lot in this life to listen to junk from, obviously, a former employee of a research institute or design bureau. You have already moved on to accusations that the chief specialists are incompetent and ignorant. This is totally unacceptable and on the verge of some kind of insanity.
About whether or not it is necessary to tell the principled things here, gaining competitors.
Partly - I agree, but not to the degree of secrecy that you have. One has to strike a balance and take advantage of voluntary help. How you manage to do everything on your own - I can't imagine, there must be plenty of time. I have no other choice but to demonstrate successes and failures, hoping to work together.
Oh, come on, no accusations. It's just a statement of facts.
You're just an idiot. That's it.
Thank you, flattered. I also know what category of employees get appointed as chief specialists.)) That's something to brag about.)
I tried to convert the price and this is what I got!
To the eye, the price chart and the converted one don't seem to be any different.
I tried to convert the price and this is what I got!
To the eye, the price chart and the converted one don't seem to be any different.
Ln(Pi/Pi+1)? Or are the increments simple?
Nah, I didn't use logarithms.
In general, I'm completely convinced that there is no sense to look for simple gradients as a signal if for Trall as an adaptor to volatility on the example of bollinger bands, non-random moves that I call spikes can occur in absolutely any configuration.
Sustained. this non-random movement of which < 3% of the time can, in a moment of non-random movement, move up and down and up and down ...