From theory to practice - page 85
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Tell that idiot thanks.
I'm leaving the forum for good.
I didn't insult anyone and I didn't impose myself on anyone.
P.S. There's nothing to be said for the offended.
Tell that idiot thanks.
I'm leaving the forum for good.
Isn't happiness so close - the dumping of rubbish on the forum pages will stop!
The author has once again deleted his posts.
Still, it's a shame we never got to hear from the transport manager. (с)
The author has once again deleted his posts.
Still, it's a shame we never got to hear from the transport manager. (с)
Is it Yusuf's?))
))
Alexandra_K on the 2nd.
It's become as quiet as a cemetery.
))
Alexandra_K on the 2nd.
It's quiet as a graveyard.
That's all right, Alexander_K 3rd will be here soon.
The amazing thing about this forum is that the truth is never born in an argument but dies... people don't know anything about it... but now they have started trying to come to a consensus on what random walks are... it's harsh... you have to be so ignorant and lack basic trader's experience.
To the issue of self-affinity and multifractality of stock quotes - here's the last example. Cycles at different levels are self-similar. And a lot of similar charts have already been posted on the forum. They are tradable.
All the same is true for the distributions that Alexander investigated... but hamsters didn't buy it as usual...
The main conclusions were made by the author of the topic - the market is a non-Markovian self-affine process.)
Answered you on the previous page
I'm tired of reading this thread, honestly.
When will TC post an analytical chart?
I would like to see that mediocre t_2 on the price chart!
A theory for nubas
https://yadi.sk/d/Cjr1WfMa3GYQWt