From theory to practice - page 84
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
You thought it was that simple, it really is, but it isn't.
I think there is something there, but yes - you have to check and prove it, and I don't have time for that. If anyone is interested, I can send you an Excel file. But I think the meaning of this algorithm is clear.
Thank you, Oleg, but I was asking specifically about standards. Tell me what I should do now with the phrase in this link of yours:
Random mechanisms can be different; more often one considers SS generated by summation of independent random variables or Markov chains. There is no precise , generally accepted definition of S. B.
End of quote.
And I was so naively hoping that the people who reported the SB standard meant something specific. That's a shame.
If it is more convenient for you, you are welcome:
Check out the "standard" branch below
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/193378
-----------
Which is what I wrote in the posts below:
"It's a whole branch, it's a pain to find. Is there really a standard defining what "SB" is?"
---
Yes. There is no standard. There are variations.
---
I am posting it for everyone. It's not Bollinger - it's usual combinatorics, "pipsing". I've just placed my favourite subject about stationarity and t2-distribution - it seems to be something. But don't ask for explanations - I really don't have time. I was working with the first column with OPEN price
In the beginning it was rare trades and hours and almost twenty-four hours, but ended up in pips.
Boring, girls. (с)
Thank you, Oleg, but I was asking specifically about standards. Tell me what I should do now with the phrase in this link of yours:
Random mechanisms can be different; more often one considers SS generated by summation of independent random variables or Markov chains. There is no precise , generally accepted definition of S. B.
End of quote.
And I had so naively hoped that the people who reported the SB standard had something specific in mind. Pity.
:-)
Oleg is right. He gave you a competent link about His Majesties STANDARDS:
https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_mathematics/5137/СЛУЧАЙНОЕ
In the beginning it was rare trades and hours and almost twenty-four hours, but ended up in pips.
Boring, girls. (с)
:-) (just kidding)
...
it looks like virginity here... but not (...girls. (с))
Alexander_K and Oleg Automat! I was reacting to the quoted message . And what are you responding to?
No, Yuri, I'm not promoting pipsing yet - I just came across it by chance, there are all sorts of t2 distributions going on there :))). Let whoever is interested check it. I will return to this subject only in case my methodology, about which I have been babbling for a month, suddenly fails to justify itself.
:-) (just kidding)
...
it looks like virginity here... but not (...girls. (с))
That's a quote from O.Bender.