From theory to practice - page 735

New comment
 
Renat Akhtyamov:

then how many times wider is the spread to recoup the cost of endlessly changing the signal?

Well, it's simple arithmetic, I think you can guess it yourself))

 
Andrei:

Well, it's simple arithmetic, I think you can figure it out))

It's an elementary flush, just like the 2 MA's.
 
Renat Akhtyamov:
It's an elementary drain, just like on the 2 MAs.
where is the plum when the edges are guaranteed to be touched?
 
Andrei:
How can you lose if it's guaranteed to touch the edges?

they are guaranteed to touch the edges calculated according to the formula

it does not mean that the price is exactly that and that there is a profit and not a loss.

their mathematics doesn't see a trend.
 
Renat Akhtyamov:

they are guaranteed to have edges calculated according to a formula

it does not mean that the price is exactly that and that there is a profit and not a loss

so you only have to close on the right edge, not where the loss is...

 
Andrei:

so you only need to close on the right edge, not where the loss is...

that's what they are trying to do, but so far no luck
 
Renat Akhtyamov:
that's exactly what they're trying to do, but so far no luck
Nah, they're going against the trend from the edge...
 
Evgeniy Chumakov:
And you are also stupid.

Personal opinion, on the last picture on the pound. All you need you have already found: "some good entry and exit by trend", the big-small one is another matter. Gone are the days when public recognition has value and converted into benefits, so you can safely exclude publicity from your work. Arguing and jumping to the assessment of personality is not really productive, especially when the opponent (s) has more than 10 years on this platform.

 
_o0O:

But how do you subscribe to the signal of those who can? You wanted to sign up if you can not do it yourself...)

So come out on the front stage, mate!

Demonstrate the state, at least with a demo.

And most importantly - give at least a minimal physical and mathematical description of your TS. It will be a business conversation.

 
Alexander_K:

And most importantly, give at least a minimum physical and mathematical description of your TS. It will be a business conversation.

Well, you yourself understand that when we are talking about the Grail, which prints money - the publication of physic-mathematical description is not a problem.

But when it's about 1-2% difference from chance, no description can be expected. This is already know-how. All in this 1-2% will not fit in any way. You need such a cow yourself)).

1...728729730731732733734735736737738739740741742...1981
New comment